Bridge v. Credit One Financial

Filing 52

ORDER granting 51 Stipulation to Extend Time to file reply re 27 MOTION to Stay Action Pursuant to the Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine Pending Outcome of Petitions Currently Before the Federal Communications Commission filed by Credit One Financial. Reply due by 3/13/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/27/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Case 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK Document 51 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Patrick J. Reilly
Nevada Bar No. 6103
Brian G. Anderson
Nevada Bar No. 10500
R. Calder Huntington
Nevada Bar No. 11996
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendant Credit One
Bank, N.A.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134

10

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12 WILLIAM BRIDGE, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
13
Plaintiff,

CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR
CREDIT ONE FINANCIAL TO FILE
REPLY TO MOTION TO STAY ACTION
PURSUANT TO PRIMARY
JURISDICTION DOCTRINE [Dkt. 27]

14 v.
15 CREDIT ONE FINANCIAL, a Nevada
Corporation d/b/a CREDIT ONE BANK,
16 N.A.
17

Defendant.

(FIRST REQUEST)

18
19
20

Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”) and Plaintiff William Bridge

21

(“Plaintiff”), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

22

Procedure 6(b)(1), and Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, hereby stipulate and agree to continue the

23

deadline for Credit One to file a Reply to its Motion to Stay Action Pursuant to the Primary

24

Jurisdiction Doctrine Pending the Outcome of Petitions Currently Before the FCC (“Motion to

25

Stay”) (Dkt. No. 27), filed on February 2, 2015, and state as follows:

26
27

1.

Plaintiff filed his Response to Credit One’s Motion to Stay on February 24, 2015

(Dkt. No. 50) and Credit One’s Reply brief deadline is currently scheduled for March 6, 2015.

28
1
7576987_1

Case 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK Document 51 Filed 02/26/15 Page 2 of 2

1
2
3

2.

Due to scheduling conflicts and prescheduled travel arrangements of Credit

One’s counsel, Credit One requests an additional week to file its Reply brief.
3.

The parties, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, and subject to

4

this Court’s approval, agree and stipulate to extend the deadline for Credit One’s Reply brief

5

from Mach 6, 2015 to March 13, 2015.

6

This stipulation for extension of time is not interposed merely for delay, and is made in

7

good faith between the parties hereto.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

9

HOLLAND & HART LLP

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.

/s/ Brian G. Anderson
PATRICK J. REILLY (NBN 6103)
BRIAN G. ANDERSON (NBN 10500)
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Attorneys for Defendant

/s/ Kyle J. McGee
ADAM J. LEVITT (admitted pro hac vice)
KYLE J. McGEE (admitted pro hac vice)
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1200
Chicago, IL 60602
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10
11
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134

12
13
14

SHOOK & STONE, CHTD.

15
/s/ Leonard H. Stone
LEONARD H. STONE (NBN 5791)
MICHAEL P. O’ROURKE (NBN 6764)
7109 S. Fourth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiff

16
17
18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED:

21
22
23

NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24

DATED: February 27, 2015

25
26
27
28
2
7576987_1