Emit v. Federal Election Commission et al

Filing 29

ORDER Denying 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , and 24 Motions. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/7/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4

RONALD SATISH EMRIT,

5
6
7
8
9

Case No. 2:14-CV-001517-APG-PAL

Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION and
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION,

(DKT. NOS. 19-24)

Defendants.

10
11

On January 12, 2015, Magistrate Judge Leen recommended I dismiss this action. (Dkt.

12

#9.) On April 13, 2015, I accepted her recommendation and dismissed this action with prejudice.

13

(Dkt. #17.) After judgment was entered, plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit filed a motion to compel

14

discovery (Dkt. #19), a motion to vacate the order dismissing the case (Dkt. #20), a motion to

15

reopen the case (Dkt. #21), a motion to request a status hearing (Dkt. #22), a motion to subpoena

16

witnesses (Dkt. #23), and a motion in limine (Dkt. #24). I have considered each of these motions

17

and find there are no valid grounds to grant any of them.

18

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery (Dkt. #19),

19

motion to vacate the order dismissing the case (Dkt. #20), motion to reopen the case (Dkt. #21),

20

motion to request a status hearing (Dkt. #22), motion to subpoena witnesses (Dkt. #23), and

21

motion in limine (Dkt. #24) are DENIED.

22

DATED this 7th day of May, 2015.

23
24
25
26
27
28

ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE