Landeros et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 32

ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation re 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 9/16/2016. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/16/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Case 2:14-cv-01525-JCM-CWH Document 31 Filed 08/15/16 Page 1 of 2

1 CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
2 C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
3 POTTER LAW OFFICES
1125 Shadow Lane
4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Tel: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
6 [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

ANGEL LANDEROS, and,
AMELIA VILLALBA;

12

Case No. 2:14-cv-01525-JCM-CWH

Plaintiffs,

13

vs.

14

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a political subdivison of
the State of Nevada; SHERIFF DOUGLAS
GILLESPIE, individually and as policy
maker of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police
Department; OFFICER SCOTT THOMAS,
individually; OFFICER JOSEPH PARRA,
individually; CLYDE VILLANUEVA,
individually; and DOE OFFICERS
1 through 10, inclusive;

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND RESPONSE TO MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Second Request)

Defendants.
COMES NOW, the above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel

22 of record, and hereby agree, jointly stipulate that the Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’
23 Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 28] filed on June 17, 2016, currently due August 25,
24 2016, be extended and additional twenty-two (22) days up to and including Friday, September
25 16, 2016. Plaintiffs’ were previously granted a forty-five (45) day extension through August
26 25, 2016 [ECF 30].
27 . . .
28 . . .

Case 2:14-cv-01525-JCM-CWH Document 31 Filed 08/15/16 Page 2 of 2

1

Although Plaintiffs’ counsel has been actively working on responding to Defendants’

2 Motion, Plaintiffs’ counsel has been unable to complete the Response. Since the filing of
3 Defendants’ Motion, Plaintiffs’ counsel has had twenty (20) depositions; seven (7) preliminary
4 hearings; seven (7) appellate briefs; numerous substantive motions and responses; as well as
5 other general appearances and deadlines. Additionally, Plaintiffs’ counsel has the upcoming
6 conflicts before beginning trial on August 29, 2016 in Griffin v. Benson, case number
7 A-14-703734-C: two (2) previously extended appellate briefs; three (3) depositions; a court8 ordered settlement conference; and trial preparation. Upon concluding trial, Plaintiffs’ counsel
9 will have availability to finalize the Response.
10

This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.

11

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Response be extended an

12 additional twenty-two (22) days up to and including Friday, September 16, 2016.
13

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT.

14 DATED this 15th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 15th day of August, 2016.

15 POTTER LAW OFFICES

MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING

16 By /s/ Cal J. Potter, III, Esq.
CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
17 Nevada Bar No. 1988
C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
18 Nevada Bar No. 13225
1125 Shadow Lane
19 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
20

By /s/ Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorney for Defendants

21
22
23
24
25
26

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 16, 2016
_______________
DATED

______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
2