Hunter v. Clark County Detention Center et al

Filing 44

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 29 the prior order granting defendant Naphcare, Inc.'s motion to dismiss as unopposed is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Christopher Hunter shall have until 3/21/2017 to respond to 26 defendant Naphcare, Inc.'s motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4

CHRISTOPHER S. HUNTER,

5

Plaintiff,

6
7
8
9

v.
CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 2:14-cv-01560-APG-VCF
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO
EXTEND TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION
TO DISMISS
(ECF No. 38)

10
11

Defendant Naphcare, Inc., erroneously sued as Napha Healthcare, previously moved to

12

dismiss plaintiff Christopher Hunter’s claims against it. ECF No. 26. Hunter did not file an

13

opposition. I therefore granted the motion as unopposed. ECF No. 29.

14

Hunter moves for reconsideration, arguing he timely mailed an opposition. ECF No. 38.

15

Hunter has not provided a copy of an opposition and one is not on file with this court. However, I

16

will grant Hunter’s request to extend time to respond to the motion to dismiss.

17
18
19
20
21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that my prior order granting defendant Naphcare, Inc.’s
motion to dismiss as unopposed (ECF No. 29) is VACATED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Christopher Hunter shall have until March 21,
2017 to respond to defendant Naphcare, Inc.’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 26).
DATED this 28th day of February, 2017.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE