Hunter v. Clark County Detention Center et al

Filing 45

ORDER Granting 41 Motion to Strike Opposition and Denying 43 Motion to Strike Letter. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 CHRISTOPHER S. HUNTER, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 8 v. CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al., Defendants. 9 Case No. 2:14-cv-01560-APG-VCF ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE OPPOSITION AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE LETTER (ECF Nos. 41, 43) 10 11 Defendant Darren MacArthur moves to strike plaintiff Christopher Hunter’s opposition at 12 ECF No. 39. MacArthur argues it is a fugitive document because MacArthur has not filed a 13 motion to dismiss and the document appears to be in response to MacArthur’s answer to the 14 complaint. I grant this motion because the document filed at ECF No. 39 is an unauthorized 15 response to MacArthur’s answer. 16 MacArthur also moves to strike Hunter’s letter to the court located at ECF No. 42. There 17 is no reason to strike the letter. To the extent the letter requests relief in the form of assurances 18 that Hunter’s motion for reconsideration and opposition to motion to dismiss have been received 19 by the court, the requested relief is moot. Both documents have been received and docketed in 20 this action. See ECF Nos. 38, 39. 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Darren MacArthur’s motion to strike opposition (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Darren MacArthur’s motion to strike letter (ECF No. 43) is DENIED. DATED this 28th day of February, 2017. 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?