Hunter v. Clark County Detention Center et al
Filing
45
ORDER Granting 41 Motion to Strike Opposition and Denying 43 Motion to Strike Letter. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
CHRISTOPHER S. HUNTER,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
v.
CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
et al.,
Defendants.
9
Case No. 2:14-cv-01560-APG-VCF
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
STRIKE OPPOSITION AND DENYING
MOTION TO STRIKE LETTER
(ECF Nos. 41, 43)
10
11
Defendant Darren MacArthur moves to strike plaintiff Christopher Hunter’s opposition at
12
ECF No. 39. MacArthur argues it is a fugitive document because MacArthur has not filed a
13
motion to dismiss and the document appears to be in response to MacArthur’s answer to the
14
complaint. I grant this motion because the document filed at ECF No. 39 is an unauthorized
15
response to MacArthur’s answer.
16
MacArthur also moves to strike Hunter’s letter to the court located at ECF No. 42. There
17
is no reason to strike the letter. To the extent the letter requests relief in the form of assurances
18
that Hunter’s motion for reconsideration and opposition to motion to dismiss have been received
19
by the court, the requested relief is moot. Both documents have been received and docketed in
20
this action. See ECF Nos. 38, 39.
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Darren MacArthur’s motion to strike
opposition (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Darren MacArthur’s motion to strike letter (ECF No.
43) is DENIED.
DATED this 28th day of February, 2017.
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?