Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Nevada Title Company

Filing 55

ORDER Granting 54 Stipulation. Settlement Conference reset for 6/27/2017 09:00 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/28/2017 Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01567-JAD-GWF Document 54 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sheri M. Thome, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 008657 Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 010532 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 727-1400; FAX (702) 727-1401 Sheri.Thome@wilsonelser.com Chad.Butterfield@wilsonelser.com Attorneys for Defendant Nevada Title Company 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 CASE NO: 2:14-cv-01567-GMN-GWF STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER TO: (1) CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; AND (2) CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO FILE THE JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER NEVADA TITLE COMPANY, a Nevada corporation, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank 18 (“FDIC-R”) and Defendant, Nevada Title Company (“Nevada Title”) (collectively the “Parties”), by 19 and through their respective counsel, hereby file this Stipulation and Order to: (1) Continue the 20 Mandatory Settlement Conference; and (2) Continue the Deadline to File the Joint Pre-Trial Order. 21 This request complies with Local Rules (“LR”) 6-1, 6-2, 7-1, and 26-4, and is based on good cause 22 because the litigation of this matter will be best served by the proposed extensions. 23 A. INTRODUCTION 24 This case arises out of Nevada Title’s closing of a real estate transaction that was funded, in 25 part, by a loan issued by Washington Mutual Bank. The real estate transaction was subsequently 26 determined to have been a fraud perpetrated by the seller, buyer, and others involved in the 27 transaction. FDIC-R contends Nevada Title failed to comply with the Washington Mutual Bank’s 28 Closing Instructions, which allegedly caused it to sustain damages when the buyer defaulted on the 1131239v.1 Page 1 of 3 Case 2:14-cv-01567-JAD-GWF Document 54 Filed 04/12/17 Page 2 of 3 1 loan. On March 30, 2017, the Court denied the Parties' respective motions for summary judgment 2 and ordered a settlement conference. (ECF No. 51). On April 3, 2017, Magistrate Judge Foley 3 scheduled the settlement conference for April 27, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. (ECF No. 53). Unfortunately, 4 the Parties are not available on April 27, 2017 and respectfully request a continuance of the 5 settlement conference to June 27, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. 6 extension to submit the Joint Pretrial Order, which is currently due on May 1, 2017 in order to 7 conserve resources and prepare for the settlement conference. Accordingly, the Parties hereby 8 stipulate and request that the deadline to file the Joint Pretrial Order be continued to sixty (60) days 9 after the proposed June 27, 2017 settlement conference to August 28, 2017. 10 B. 11 12 C. 2017. All other deadlines shall remain in effect. D. 17 18 21 DISCOVERY COMPLETED BY THE PARTIES Discovery is closed. E. 19 20 PROPOSED SCHEDULE The Parties propose extending the deadline for filing the Joint Pretrial Order to August 28, 15 16 CURRENT SCHEDULE Discovery is closed. The Joint Pretrial Order is due on or before May 1, 2017. 13 14 The Parties also respectfully request an DISCOVERY REMAINING TO BE COMPLETED None. F. STATEMENT OF GOOD CAUSE SUPPORTING THIS REQUEST Good cause exists for extending the above-referenced deadline. The Court has ordered the 22 Parties to participate in a settlement conference, currently set for April 27, 2017. 23 unavoidable scheduling conflicts, the Parties are unavailable to participate in the settlement 24 conference on April 27, 2017 and respectfully request a continuance of the settlement conference to 25 June 27, 2017 at which time the Parties will attend and participate in the settlement conference in 26 good faith. Furthermore, in light of the pending settlement conference, the parties believe this 27 litigation will be best served by continuing the deadline to file the Joint Pretrial Order from its 28 current deadline of May 1, 2017 to August 28, 2017, which is sixty (60) days after the proposed June 1131239v.1 Page 2 of 3 Due to Case 2:14-cv-01567-JAD-GWF Document 54 Filed 04/12/17 Page 3 of 3 1 27, 2017 settlement conference. Accordingly, the parties submit that good cause exists for this 2 stipulation and proposed order. 3 4 DATED this 12th day of April, 2017 DATED this 12th day of April, 2017 5 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP MORTGAGE RECOVERY LAW GROUP, LLP BY: /s/ Chad C. Butterfield Sheri M. Thome, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 008657 Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 010532 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 BY: /s/ Orlando Villalba Orlando Villalba, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice California Bar No. 232165 700 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 830 Glendale, California 91203 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant Nevada Title Company 13 14 15 KOLESAR & LEATHAM Bart K. Larsen, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 008538 Shlomo S. Sherman, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 009688 400 South Rampart Blvd., Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Plaintiff F.D.I.C. as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) that the settlement conference, 21 currently scheduled for April 27, 2017, shall be continued to June 27, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.; and (2) that 22 the deadline for the Parties to file the Joint Pretrial Order, currently set for May 1, 2017, shall be 23 continued to August 28, 2017. 24 Dated this _____ day of April, 2017 13th 25 26 ________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1131239v.1 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?