Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Nevada Title Company
Filing
55
ORDER Granting 54 Stipulation. Settlement Conference reset for 6/27/2017 09:00 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/28/2017 Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:14-cv-01567-JAD-GWF Document 54 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sheri M. Thome, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 008657
Chad C. Butterfield, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 010532
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 727-1400; FAX (702) 727-1401
Sheri.Thome@wilsonelser.com
Chad.Butterfield@wilsonelser.com
Attorneys for Defendant Nevada Title Company
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION AS RECEIVER OF
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
CASE NO:
2:14-cv-01567-GMN-GWF
STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER
TO: (1) CONTINUE THE MANDATORY
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; AND (2)
CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO FILE
THE JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER
NEVADA TITLE COMPANY, a Nevada
corporation,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank
18
(“FDIC-R”) and Defendant, Nevada Title Company (“Nevada Title”) (collectively the “Parties”), by
19
and through their respective counsel, hereby file this Stipulation and Order to: (1) Continue the
20
Mandatory Settlement Conference; and (2) Continue the Deadline to File the Joint Pre-Trial Order.
21
This request complies with Local Rules (“LR”) 6-1, 6-2, 7-1, and 26-4, and is based on good cause
22
because the litigation of this matter will be best served by the proposed extensions.
23
A.
INTRODUCTION
24
This case arises out of Nevada Title’s closing of a real estate transaction that was funded, in
25
part, by a loan issued by Washington Mutual Bank. The real estate transaction was subsequently
26
determined to have been a fraud perpetrated by the seller, buyer, and others involved in the
27
transaction. FDIC-R contends Nevada Title failed to comply with the Washington Mutual Bank’s
28
Closing Instructions, which allegedly caused it to sustain damages when the buyer defaulted on the
1131239v.1
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:14-cv-01567-JAD-GWF Document 54 Filed 04/12/17 Page 2 of 3
1
loan. On March 30, 2017, the Court denied the Parties' respective motions for summary judgment
2
and ordered a settlement conference. (ECF No. 51). On April 3, 2017, Magistrate Judge Foley
3
scheduled the settlement conference for April 27, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. (ECF No. 53). Unfortunately,
4
the Parties are not available on April 27, 2017 and respectfully request a continuance of the
5
settlement conference to June 27, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.
6
extension to submit the Joint Pretrial Order, which is currently due on May 1, 2017 in order to
7
conserve resources and prepare for the settlement conference. Accordingly, the Parties hereby
8
stipulate and request that the deadline to file the Joint Pretrial Order be continued to sixty (60) days
9
after the proposed June 27, 2017 settlement conference to August 28, 2017.
10
B.
11
12
C.
2017.
All other deadlines shall remain in effect.
D.
17
18
21
DISCOVERY COMPLETED BY THE PARTIES
Discovery is closed.
E.
19
20
PROPOSED SCHEDULE
The Parties propose extending the deadline for filing the Joint Pretrial Order to August 28,
15
16
CURRENT SCHEDULE
Discovery is closed. The Joint Pretrial Order is due on or before May 1, 2017.
13
14
The Parties also respectfully request an
DISCOVERY REMAINING TO BE COMPLETED
None.
F.
STATEMENT OF GOOD CAUSE SUPPORTING THIS REQUEST
Good cause exists for extending the above-referenced deadline. The Court has ordered the
22
Parties to participate in a settlement conference, currently set for April 27, 2017.
23
unavoidable scheduling conflicts, the Parties are unavailable to participate in the settlement
24
conference on April 27, 2017 and respectfully request a continuance of the settlement conference to
25
June 27, 2017 at which time the Parties will attend and participate in the settlement conference in
26
good faith. Furthermore, in light of the pending settlement conference, the parties believe this
27
litigation will be best served by continuing the deadline to file the Joint Pretrial Order from its
28
current deadline of May 1, 2017 to August 28, 2017, which is sixty (60) days after the proposed June
1131239v.1
Page 2 of 3
Due to
Case 2:14-cv-01567-JAD-GWF Document 54 Filed 04/12/17 Page 3 of 3
1
27, 2017 settlement conference. Accordingly, the parties submit that good cause exists for this
2
stipulation and proposed order.
3
4
DATED this 12th day of April, 2017
DATED this 12th day of April, 2017
5
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN
& DICKER LLP
MORTGAGE RECOVERY LAW
GROUP, LLP
BY: /s/ Chad C. Butterfield
Sheri M. Thome, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 008657
Chad C. Butterfield, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 010532
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
BY: /s/ Orlando Villalba
Orlando Villalba, Esq.
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
California Bar No. 232165
700 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 830
Glendale, California 91203
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant Nevada Title Company
13
14
15
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
Bart K. Larsen, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 008538
Shlomo S. Sherman, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 009688
400 South Rampart Blvd., Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorneys for Plaintiff F.D.I.C. as Receiver
for Washington Mutual Bank
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) that the settlement conference,
21
currently scheduled for April 27, 2017, shall be continued to June 27, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.; and (2) that
22
the deadline for the Parties to file the Joint Pretrial Order, currently set for May 1, 2017, shall be
23
continued to August 28, 2017.
24
Dated this _____ day of April, 2017
13th
25
26
________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1131239v.1
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?