Cuen-Salazar et al v. Bringard et al

Filing 47

ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 46 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Sandra Hernandez's case is DISMISSED without PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serv e this Order on the persons and respective addresses noted in the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/24/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

***

8
9

CUEN-SALAZAR et al.,

10
11
12
13

v.

Case No. 2:14-cv-01570-RFB-CWH
Plaintiff’s, ORDER
ACCEPTING
REPORT
&
RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE CARL W. HOFFMAN

BRINGARD et al.,
Defendant’s.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) of the
Honorable Carl W. Hoffman, United States Magistrate Judge, entered February 23, 2016.
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific
written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is
required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed
findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local
Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct
“any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due
by March 11, 2016. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this
case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation.

28
1

1
2
3
4

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Sandra Hernandez’s case is DISMISSED without
PREJUDICE.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on the persons

6

and respective addresses noted in the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter judgment

7

accordingly and close the case.

8

DATED this 24th day of March, 2016.

9
10

_____________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2