Ballentine et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 230

ORDER Granting 229 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 227 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/1/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5

Margaret A. McLetchie, NBN 10931
Alina M. Shell, NBN 11711
MCLETCHIE LAW
701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10

BRIAN BALLENTINE, an individual;
CATALINO DAZO, an individual; KELLY
PATTERSON, an individual; and GAIL
SACCO, an individual;

11

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
[phone] (T) / [phone] (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM

12
13

Case. No.: 2:14-cv-01584-APG-EJY

Plaintiffs,
vs.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, in its official capacity;
DETECTIVE CHRISTOPHER T. TUCKER, as
an individual and in his official capacity as a
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Detective; SERGEANT MIKE WALLACE, as
an individual and in his official capacity as a
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Sergeant; LIEUTENANT JOHN LIBERTY, as
an individual and in his official capacity as a
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Lieutenant,

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THEIR
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT TUCKER’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT (ECF No. 227)
(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendants.

24
25
26

Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel

27

of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline to file the Plaintiffs’

28

Response to Defendant Tucker’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 227) in the

1

1

above-captioned case) an additional twenty-eight (28) days, up to and including November

2

1, 2019.

3

This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or

4

other purpose of delay. This is the first request for an extension of time. This request for

5

extension is based upon the following:

6
7
8

Counsel for Plaintiffs have had deadlines in other matters which interfere with the
preparation of their response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. In particular,
counsel are representing the plaintiff in a federal civil rights case in the Central District of

9
California, Michelle Suzanne Hadley v. City of Anaheim, et al., C.D. Dist. Ct. Case No. 8:1810
11

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
[phone] (T) / [phone] (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM

12
13
14

cv-01831-DOC-KES. Discovery in that matter closes on October 17, 2019, and counsel for
Plaintiffs will be in the Central District of California conducting depositions in anticipation
of the close of discovery. In addition, counsel for Plaintiffs have several deadlines in state
court matters which interfere with the preparation of their response.

15

///

16

///

17

///

18

///

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25
26
27
28

///
///
///
///
2

1

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the time for

2

the Plaintiffs to file their Response to Defendant Tucker’s Motion for Summary Judgment

3

(ECF No. 227) by twenty-eight (28) days from the current deadline of October 4, 2019 up to

4

and including November 1, 2019.

5
6

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated this 2nd day of October, 2019.

Dated this 2nd day of October, 2019.

MCLETCHIE LAW

MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING

/s/ Alina M. Shell
Margaret A. McLetchie, NBN 10931
Alina M. Shell, NBN 11711
701 East Bridger Avenue, Suite 520
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

/s/ Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Craig R. Anderson, Esq., NBN 6882
Nick Crosby, Esq., NBN 8996
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorneys for Defendants

7
8
9
10
11

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
[phone] (T) / [phone] (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM

12
13
14
15
16

ORDER

17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

DATED:

19
20
21
22

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 2, 2019.

23
24
25
26
27
28

3