Ballentine et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 232

ORDER Granting 231 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 227 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/15/2019. Replies due by 12/11/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5

Margaret A. McLetchie, NBN 10931
Alina M. Shell, NBN 11711
MCLETCHIE LAW
701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10

BRIAN BALLENTINE, an individual;
CATALINO DAZO, an individual; KELLY
PATTERSON, an individual; and GAIL
SACCO, an individual;

11

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
[phone] (T) / [phone] (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM

12
13

Case. No.: 2:14-cv-01584-APG-EJY

Plaintiffs,
vs.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, in its official capacity;
DETECTIVE CHRISTOPHER T. TUCKER, as
an individual and in his official capacity as a
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Detective; SERGEANT MIKE WALLACE, as
an individual and in his official capacity as a
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Sergeant; LIEUTENANT JOHN LIBERTY, as
an individual and in his official capacity as a
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Lieutenant,

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THEIR
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT TUCKER’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT (ECF No. 227)
(SECOND REQUEST)

Defendants.

24
Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel
25
26

of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline to file the Plaintiffs’
Response to Defendant Tucker’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 227) in the

27
above-captioned case) an additional fourteen (14) days, up to and including November 15,
28

1

1

2019. The parties further stipulate and request that this Court permit Defendant until

2

December 11, 2019 to file his Reply.

3

This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or

4

other purpose of delay. This is the second request for an extension of time. This request for

5

extension is based upon the following:

6

Counsel for Plaintiffs have had deadlines in other matters in both state and federal

7

court which have interfered with the preparation of their response to Defendant’s Motion for

8

Summary Judgment.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the time for

10

the Plaintiffs to file their Response to Defendant Tucker’s Motion for Summary Judgment

11

(ECF No. 227) by fourteen (14) days from the current deadline of November 1, 2019 up to

12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
[phone] (T) / [phone] (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM

9

and including November 15, 2019 and Defendant until December 11, 2019 to file his Reply.

13

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

14

Dated this 31st day of October, 2019.

Dated this 31st day of October, 2019.

15

MCLETCHIE LAW

MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING

/s/ Margaret A. McLetchie
Margaret A. McLetchie, NBN 10931
Alina M. Shell, NBN 11711
701 East Bridger Avenue, Suite 520
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

/s/ Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Craig R. Anderson, Esq., NBN 6882
Nick Crosby, Esq., NBN 8996
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorneys for Defendants

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

ORDER

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

______________________________
DATED:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 31, 2019.

26
27
28

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

2