Donald Okada v. Nevada Property 1, LLC

Filing 45

ORDER Denying without prejudice 44 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/30/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
DONALD OKADA,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
NEVADA PROPERTY 1 LLC,
14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-01601-RCJ-NJK
ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY
PLAN
(Docket No. 44)

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan. See Docket No. 44. In light

16
17

of the pending motion to stay discovery, see Docket No. 41, the Court hereby DENIES the discovery

18

plan without prejudice. In the event the motion to stay discovery is denied, the parties shall file a

19

renewed proposed discovery plan within 7 days of the order resolving the motion to stay.1

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

DATED: October 30, 2014

22

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Although the Court does not herein rule on the proposed discovery plan, the Court notes that the
parties incorrectly state that Local Rule 26-4 requires requests to extend deadlines to be filed at least 21
days before the discovery cut-off. See Docket No. 44 at 4. Any renewed discovery plan shall correctly
state that any such request must be filed at least 21 days before expiration of the subject deadline sought
to be extended (e.g., a request to extend the expert disclosure deadline must be filed at least 21 days
before the expiration of that deadline).