Dryden v. Faen et al

Filing 72

ORDER Granting 69 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 JEFFREY L. DRYDEN, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 JANITA FAEN, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01625-GMN-NJK ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY (Docket No. 69) 14 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending a ruling on their 15 unopposed motion to dismiss. Docket No. 69. See also Docket No. 59. The motion to stay was filed 16 on March 14, 2017, but Plaintiff has failed to file a response to date. See Docket; see also Local Rule 17 7-2(b). Accordingly, the motion may be granted as unopposed. See Local Rule 7-2(d). Additionally, 18 the Court has reviewed the motion and finds good cause for granting it. Because the motion is 19 unopposed and for good cause shown, the motion to stay discovery pending a ruling on Defendants’ 20 unopposed motion to dismiss, Docket No. 69, is hereby GRANTED. In the event Defendants’ motion 21 to dismiss is not granted in full, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint discovery plan within 14 days 22 of the order resolving that motion. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: March 29, 2017. 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?