Dryden v. Faen et al

Filing 72

ORDER Granting 69 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
JEFFREY L. DRYDEN,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
JANITA FAEN, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-01625-GMN-NJK
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO STAY
(Docket No. 69)

14

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending a ruling on their

15

unopposed motion to dismiss. Docket No. 69. See also Docket No. 59. The motion to stay was filed

16

on March 14, 2017, but Plaintiff has failed to file a response to date. See Docket; see also Local Rule

17

7-2(b). Accordingly, the motion may be granted as unopposed. See Local Rule 7-2(d). Additionally,

18

the Court has reviewed the motion and finds good cause for granting it. Because the motion is

19

unopposed and for good cause shown, the motion to stay discovery pending a ruling on Defendants’

20

unopposed motion to dismiss, Docket No. 69, is hereby GRANTED. In the event Defendants’ motion

21

to dismiss is not granted in full, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint discovery plan within 14 days

22

of the order resolving that motion.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

DATED: March 29, 2017.

25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge