Flores v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
90
ORDER granting 87 Motion for Leave to File Document; ORDER granting 89 Motion to Extend Time Re: 71 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents will have up to and including November 12, 2021, to file an answer or other response. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/14/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
JESUS I. FLORES,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
Case No. 2:14-cv-01629-GMN-VCF
ORDER
v.
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, SR., et al.,
15
Respondents.
16
Two motions currently are before the court. First, respondents filed a motion for leave to
17
18
file document under seal. ECF No. 87. The document in question is petitioner's pre-sentence
19
investigation report, which is confidential under state law. The court finds that compelling
20
reasons exist to file this document under seal. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu,
21
447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006).
Second, respondents filed an unopposed motion for extension of time (third request). ECF
22
23
No. 89. The court will grant this motion.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that respondents' motion for leave to file document under
24
25
seal (ECF No. 87) is GRANTED.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents' unopposed motion for extension of time
2
(third request) (ECF No. 89) is GRANTED. Respondents will have up to and including
3
November 12, 2021, to file an answer or other response to the fourth amended petition (ECF No.
4
71).
5
DATED: October 14, 2021
6
______________________________
GLORIA M. NAVARRO
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?