Peters v. Walgreen Co.

Filing 17

ORDER re 16 motion to Extend Time re 11 Scheduling Order. The Defendant represents that it does not expect an opposition to its request for a 90 day extension. Should Plaintiff wish to file an opposition, it must do so by January 23, 2015. Should the Plaintiff choose not to respond, the motion will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/16/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ROSEANNE PETERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WALGREEN CO., and DOES I-X and ROE ) CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive; ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:14-cv-01634-MMD-GWF ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Walgreen Co.’s Motion to Amend the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#16), filed on January 15, 2015. The Defendant represents that it does not expect an opposition to its request for a 90 day 16 extension. Should Plaintiff wish to file an opposition, it must do so by January 23, 2015. Should 17 the Plaintiff choose not to respond, the motion will be granted. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 DATED this 16th day of January, 2015. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?