Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle International Corporation

Filing 189

ORDER Granting 188 Stipulated Supplemental Protective Order Concerning Documents Produced Pursuant to the Parties' Technology-Assisted Review Protocol. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 03/25/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 188 Filed 03/24/16 Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
RICHARD J. POCKER (NV Bar No. 3568)
300 South Fourth Street, Suite 800
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

HOWARD & HOWARD PLLC
W. WEST ALLEN (Nevada Bar No. 5566)
[e-mail]
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1000
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimilie: [phone]

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (pro hac vice)
BEKO O. REBLITZ-RICHARDSON
(pro hac vice)
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP
B. TRENT WEBB (pro hac vice)
JOHN D. GARRETSON (pro hac vice)
RYAN D. DYKAL (pro hac vice)
PETER STRAND (pro hac vice)
LYNN C. HERNDON (pro hac vice)
2555 Grand Boulevard
Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2613
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
THOMAS S. HIXSON (pro hac vice)
JOHN A. POLITO (pro hac vice)
NITIN JINDAL (pro hac vice)
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.442.1001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
DORIAN DALEY (pro hac vice)
DEBORAH K. MILLER (pro hac vice)
JAMES C. MAROULIS (pro hac vice)
ORACLE CORPORATION
500 Oracle Parkway
M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94070
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7114
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Counterclaimant Oracle
America, Inc. and Defendant and
Counterclaimant Oracle International Corp.

25

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP
ROBERT H. RECKERS (pro hac vice)
600 Travis Street, Suite 3400
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP
THOMAS DAMMRICH (pro hac vice)
111 South Wacker Drive, 51st Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
JAMES J. PASTORE (pro hac vice)
JOHN S. KIERNAN (pro hac vice)
919 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

26
27
28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
DB3/ 200781540.1

Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 188 Filed 03/24/16 Page 2 of 5
DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
JEFFREY P. CUNARD (pro hac vice)
555 13th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

1
2
3
4

RIMINI STREET, INC.
DANIEL B. WINSLOW (pro hac vice)
6601 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 300
Pleasanton, California 94566
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8

JOHN P. REILLY (pro hac vice)

9

3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500
Las Vegas, NV 89169

10

Telephone: [phone])

11

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter
Defendant Rimini Street, Inc., and Counter
Defendant Seth Ravin

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

15
16

RIMINI STREET, INC., a Nevada corporation;
Plaintiff,

17
18
19

v.
ORACLE INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION, a California corporation,

20

Case No 2:14-cv-01699 LRH PAL
STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONCERNING DOCUMENTS
PRODUCED PURSUANT TO THE
PARTIES’ TECHNOLOGYASSISTED REVIEW PROTOCOL

Defendant.

21
22
23

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation, et al.,
Counterclaimants,

24
25
26

v.
RIMINI STREET, INC., a Nevada corporation,
et al.,

27

Counterdefendants.

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
DB3/ 200781540.1

Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 188 Filed 03/24/16 Page 3 of 5
1

WHEREAS, the Court entered a Stipulated Protective Order on May 18, 2015 (Dkt. 58);

2

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Rimini Street, Inc. and Counterdefendant

3

Seth Ravin (together, “Rimini”) and Counterclaimant Oracle America, Inc. and Defendant and

4

Counterclaimant Oracle International Corp. (together, “Oracle”; all parties collectively,

5

“Parties,” any party, “Party”) have agreed that the Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 58) should

6

be amended to add the following provisions to better effectuate the Parties’ proposed

7

technology-assisted review protocol, Dkt. 106, Ex. A (the “TAR Protocol”);

8
9
10
11
12
13

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that all paragraph references and defined terms
below refer to the paragraphs and definitions of the Stipulated Protective Order unless otherwise
stated;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES
THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, AS FOLLOWS:
24.

All documents and other materials produced pursuant to the TAR Protocol or any

14

subsequent version thereof agreed to by the Parties (“TAR Documents”) shall be produced with a

15

metadata field that identifies them as TAR Documents.

16
17
18

25.

All TAR Documents shall be designated and treated by all Parties as “Highly

Confidential Information – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” at the time of production.
26.

Notwithstanding any provisions in Paragraph 16 to the contrary, any challenge to a

19

Designating Party’s confidentiality designation of any TAR Documents may be initiated either in

20

writing or via voice-to-voice dialogue. Any such challenge must identify the challenged

21

confidentiality designations by the Bates number(s) of the corresponding TAR Documents. The

22

Designating Party shall respond in writing to any such challenge within ten (10) days. If the Parties

23

are unable to resolve any dispute regarding a challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

24

designation of TAR Documents, the Parties will submit their dispute(s) to the Court in the manner

25

approved by the Court for raising discovery disputes in this case. For the avoidance of doubt,

26

Paragraph 16 otherwise remains in full force and effect.

27
28

27.

For the avoidance of doubt, the ten-day deadline set forth in Paragraph 26 will be

calculated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

1
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
DB3/ 200781540.1

Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 188 Filed 03/24/16 Page 4 of 5
1

6(d)’s three-day extension for documents served electronically does not apply to the ten-day

2

deadline.

3

28.

The Parties may modify this procedure, including but not limited to the deadline set

4

forth in Paragraph 26, for any set of TAR Documents through written agreement without further

5

order of the Court.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Dated: March 24, 2016
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

By:

By:

/s/ Peter E. Strand
Peter E. Strand
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
Rimini Street, Inc. and Counterdefendant
Seth Ravin

/s/ Thomas S. Hixson
Thomas S. Hixson
Attorneys for Counterclaimant Oracle
America, Inc. and Defendant and
Counterclaimant Oracle International Corp.

14
15
16

IS IT SO ORDERED:
March 25
DATED: ______________, 2016

17

By: ___________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
DB3/ 200781540.1

Case 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-PAL Document 188 Filed 03/24/16 Page 5 of 5
1

ATTESTATION OF FILER

2
3

The signatories to this document are Peter E. Strand and me, and I have obtained
Mr. Strand’s concurrence to file this document on his behalf.

4
5

Dated: March 24, 2016

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

6
By:

/s/ Thomas S. Hixson
Thomas S. Hixson
Attorneys for Counterclaimant Oracle
America, Inc. and Defendant and
Counterclaimant Oracle International Corp.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
DB3/ 200781540.1