Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle International Corporation

Filing 677

ORDER Re: ECF Nos. 631 Memorandum, 642 Brief, 664 Brief : The Court has reviewed the briefs and does not believe a status conference is necessary at this time. Rimini and Oracle may proceed with their motions to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

RIMINI STREET, INC.,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORP.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
_______________________________________ )

Case No. 2:14-cv-01699-LRH-CWH

ORDER

10

Presently before the Court is the parties’ memorandum (ECF No. 631), filed on October 31,

11

2017. Also before the Court is the parties’ joint brief (ECF No. 642), filed on November 22, 2017.

12

Also before the Court is the parties’ joint brief (ECF No. 664), filed on December 15, 2017.

13

On December 16, 2016, the Court ordered (ECF No. 372) that before filing any further

14

discovery motions in this case, that the parties must submit a brief memo outlining the nature of the

15

disputes and whether the parties believe those disputes can be resolved via a telephonic status

16

conference rather than formal briefing.

17

In their joint memorandum (ECF No. 631), the parties request a telephonic status conference

18

regarding disputed RFP’s. The memo indicates that the parties have not met and conferred on each

19

disputed aspect of the RFP’s. The Court will therefore require the parties to make further attempts to

20

meet and confer before taking any action on this memorandum.

21

In their joint brief dated November 22, 2017 (ECF No. 642), the parties request a telephonic

22

status conference regarding Rimini’s intent to move to compel Oracle’s response to Interrogatories 5,

23

7-11, and 22. The Court has reviewed the brief and does not believe a status conference is necessary

24

at this time. Rimini may proceed with its motion to compel.

25

In their joint brief dated December 15, 2017 (ECF No. 664), the parties request a telephonic

26

status conference regarding Oracle’s intention to file a motion to compel supplemental responses to

27

their Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 10. The Court has reviewed the brief and does not believe a status

28

conference is necessary at this time. Oracle may proceed with its motion to compel.
1

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

DATED: January 19, 2018

3
4

_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2