Hakkasan LV, LLC et al v. Adamczyk et al

Filing 28

ORDER Denying 27 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order due by 2/4/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/21/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 HAKKASAN LV, LLC, et al., 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 27. The Local 9 Plaintiff(s), 10 vs. 11 MARK DANIEL ADAMCZYK, et al., 12 Defendant(s). Case No. 2:14-cv-01717-GMN-NJK ORDER 15 Rules require the parties to participate in a conference regarding discovery and submit a joint 16 discovery plan to the Court. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f); Local Rule 26-1(d). The pending 17 discovery plan indicates that Defendant Adamcyzk refused to participate in the Rule 26(f) 18 conference or in the submission of the discovery plan. See Docket No. 27 at 1-2. The pending 19 discovery plan is hereby DENIED. 20 The Court hereby ORDERS Defendant Adamcyzk to contact Plaintiffs’ counsel by 21 telephone, no later than January 28, 2015, to arrange a time and date to hold the Rule 26(f) 22 conference. Defendant Adamcyzk is further ORDERED to participate in the preparing of a proposed 23 discovery plan. The parties are lastly ORDERED to file a proposed discovery plan no later than 24 February 4, 2015. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: January 21, 2015 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?