Hakkasan LV, LLC et al v. Adamczyk et al
Filing
49
ORDER re 38 Order. The Court hereby ADMONISHES Defendant for failing to comply with Court orders. To the extent this case continues, the Court warns Defendant that future non-compliance with orders may result in the imposition of significant sanctions, up to and including case-dispositive sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
HAKKASAN LV, LLC, et al.,
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
15
On February 18, 2015, the Court ordered Defendant Mark Daniel Adamcyzk (“Defendant”)
16
to show cause in writing why he should not be sanctioned. Docket No. 34. Defendant then filed an
17
unsigned response. Docket No. 36. The unsigned response was stricken and Defendant was ordered
18
to file a signed response. Docket No. 38. No signed response was ever filed. The Court hereby
19
ADMONISHES Defendant for failing to comply with Court orders. To the extent this case
20
continues,1 the Court warns Defendant that future non-compliance with orders may result in the
21
imposition of significant sanctions, up to and including case-dispositive sanctions.
10
Plaintiff(s),
11
vs.
12
MARK DANIEL ADAMCZYK, et al.,
13
Defendant(s).
22
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Case No. 2:14-cv-01717-GMN-NJK
DATED: June 9, 2015
24
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
1
27
28
It appears Defendant has ceased participating in this case, as he failed to respond to Plaintiffs’
motion for summary judgment and motion to strike the amended answer and counterclaim. See Docket Nos.
39, 41.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?