Helfrich v. Neven et al

Filing 295

ORDER Denying 293 Motion For A Speedy Trial and 294 Motion for Judical Notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 PETER J. HELFRICH, 6 Plaintiff(s), 7 vs. 8 DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., 9 Defendant(s). 10 11 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-NJK ORDER (Docket Nos. 293, 294) Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions for a speedy trial and judicial notice. Docket No. 293, 294. As the Court noted in a prior order, Docket No. 55, the right to a speedy trial only applies 14 to criminal cases. See U.S. Const. amend. VI (stating that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the 15 accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial”). This is a civil case in which Plaintiff 16 has alleged violations of his civil rights. See, e.g., Docket No. 1. 17 Plaintiff’s motion for judicial notice appears to request the Court to take notice of his 18 demand for a speedy trial, and reiterates his general allegations against Defendants. The Court, 19 as noted above, finds that speedy trial rights do not apply to Plaintiff’s case. Moreover, the Court 20 will not rule on the merits of Plaintiff’s allegations in the context of a motion for judicial notice. 21 Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for a speedy trial, Docket No. 22 293, and his motion for judicial notice, Docket No. 294. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: September 20, 2016 25 26 27 28 NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?