Helfrich v. Neven et al
Filing
295
ORDER Denying 293 Motion For A Speedy Trial and 294 Motion for Judical Notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
PETER J. HELFRICH,
6
Plaintiff(s),
7
vs.
8
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
9
Defendant(s).
10
11
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket Nos. 293, 294)
Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions for a speedy trial and judicial notice.
Docket No. 293, 294.
As the Court noted in a prior order, Docket No. 55, the right to a speedy trial only applies
14
to criminal cases. See U.S. Const. amend. VI (stating that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the
15
accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial”). This is a civil case in which Plaintiff
16
has alleged violations of his civil rights. See, e.g., Docket No. 1.
17
Plaintiff’s motion for judicial notice appears to request the Court to take notice of his
18
demand for a speedy trial, and reiterates his general allegations against Defendants. The Court,
19
as noted above, finds that speedy trial rights do not apply to Plaintiff’s case. Moreover, the Court
20
will not rule on the merits of Plaintiff’s allegations in the context of a motion for judicial notice.
21
Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for a speedy trial, Docket No.
22
293, and his motion for judicial notice, Docket No. 294.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
DATED: September 20, 2016
25
26
27
28
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?