Helfrich v. Neven et al

Filing 92

ORDER granting 88 Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order to the deadline for submission of motions for summary judgment for 60 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/20/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-NJK Document 88 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Nevada Attorney General DENISE S. McKAY Senior Deputy Attorney General Nevada Bar No. 10507 E-mail: dmckay@ag.nv.gov Public Safety Division 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 P: (702) 486-3420 F: (702) 486-3773 Attorneys for Defendants James G. Cox, Dwight Neven, Jerry Howell, Paul Bitar, and Joseph Hanson 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 16 17 18 PETER J. HELFRICH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-(NJK) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) 19 20 Defendants, James G. Cox, Dwight Neven, Jerry Howell, Dr. Paul Bitar (“Dr. Bitar”), and 21 Dr. Joseph Hanson (“Dr. Hanson”), by and through their counsel of record, Adam Paul Laxalt, 22 Nevada Attorney General, and Denise S. McKay, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Case 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-NJK Document 88 Filed 04/17/15 Page 2 of 5 1 move for an amendment of the Scheduling Order on file with regard only to the deadline for 2 submission of motions for summary judgment. This Motion is made and based on the enclosed 3 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, declaration of Denise S. McKay, and the papers and 4 pleadings on file. DATED this 17th day of April, 2015. 5 6 Respectfully submitted, 7 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Nevada Attorney General 8 9 By: 10 11 /s/ Denise S. McKay DENISE S. McKAY Senior Deputy Attorney General Nevada State Bar No. 10507 12 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 13 14 I. SUMMARY OF REQUEST 15 Pursuant to the Scheduling Order issued by this Court on April 6, 2015, the parties’ 16 motions for summary judgment are due by August 5, 2015. (Dkt. # 83). Defendants seek a 17 60-day extension of that deadline only, to October 5, 2015. 18 II. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY 19 Plaintiff commenced this civil rights action alleging a deprivation of his Eighth Amendment 20 rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint on 21 October 29, 2014, holding that Plaintiff stated colorable claims under the Eighth Amendment in 22 Counts I, II, V, VII, VIII, IX, and X against Defendants Cox Neven, Howell, Bitar, and Hanson, as 23 well as John Doe Sgt. and Jane and John Doe Pill Call Nurses. (Dkt. # 8). The Court further 24 addressed Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. # 4) and ordered Defendants to 25 respond to it by November 12, 2014. (Dkt. # 8). Defendants did (Dkt. # 13), and the motion for 26 preliminary injunction is now fully briefed and pending. The Court also stayed the action for 27 90 days and referred it for participation in the Early Mediation Conference (EMC) program. 28 /// 2 Case 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-NJK Document 88 Filed 04/17/15 Page 3 of 5 1 Following the parties’ failure to reach a settlement at the EMC on January 30, 2015, 2 Defendants filed an Answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint on April 3, 2015. (Dkt. # 82). 3 The Court issued its Scheduling Order on April 6, 2015. (Dkt. # 83). The Scheduling Order set 4 August 5, 2015, as the deadline for the parties to submit motions for summary judgment. 5 Defendants now seek a 60-day extension of that deadline only. 6 III. 7 8 9 DEFENDANTS REQUEST A 60-DAY EXTENSION TO THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) authorizes the court to extend the time for the doing of an act upon a showing of good cause if the request is made before the original time expires. 10 Defendants’ counsel will be taking 12 weeks of personal leave beginning on or around 11 June 1, 2015. (Declaration of Denise S. McKay attached hereto as Exhibit A). It is because 12 counsel will be on leave during the time set for submission of motions for summary judgment 13 that Defendants make this request. By extending the summary judgment deadline by 60 days, 14 Defendants’ counsel will have adequate time to return from leave and submit a thorough and 15 complete motion for summary judgment by October 5, 2015. While another Deputy Attorney 16 General from the Nevada Office of the Attorney General will be assigned to this matter during 17 undersigned counsel’s leave period to provide coverage concerning any discovery disputes, 18 undersigned counsel requests the extension so that she may be responsible for submitting the 19 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as she has been the attorney assigned to this matter 20 from its inception and is most familiar with the claims at issue. The extension of this deadline will 21 not prejudice Plaintiff, as it will not shorten or otherwise impact his ability to conduct discovery, 22 nor will it affect his ability to obtain emergency injunctive relief, since such relief is the subject of 23 a separate, fully-briefed and pending motion for preliminary injunction. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 3 Case 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-NJK Document 88 Filed 04/17/15 Page 4 of 5 1 Defendants submit that they have shown good cause justifying a 60-day extension to the 2 deadline for the parties’ submission of motions for summary judgment and they request that the 3 Court grant the same. 4 DATED this 17th day of April, 2015. 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Nevada Attorney General 7 8 9 10 11 By: /s/ Denise S. McKay DENISE S. McKAY Senior Deputy Attorney General Nevada State Bar No. 10507 Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 20, 2015 15 16 17 _________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-NJK Document 88 Filed 04/17/15 Page 5 of 5 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that I am an employee of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney 3 General, and that on the 17th day of April, 2015, I served the foregoing, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 4 TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (FIRST REQUEST), by causing a true and correct copy 5 thereof to be filed with the Clerk of the Court, using the electronic filing system, and by causing a 6 true and correct copy thereof to be delivered to the Department of General Services, for mailing at 7 Las Vegas, Nevada, addressed to the following: 8 9 10 Peter Helfrich, #1111875 High Desert State Prison P.O. Box 650 Indian Springs, Nevada 89070 Plaintiff, Pro Se 11 12 13 14 /s/ Carol Knight CAROL KNIGHT An employee of: STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Case 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-NJK Document 88-1 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 2 Case 2:14-cv-01725-RFB-NJK Document 88-1 Filed 04/17/15 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?