Dahl v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. et al

Filing 36

ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/28/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01737-JCM-PAL Document 35 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 ERIC E. DAHL, an individual, 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) Case No.: 2:14-cv-01737-JCM-PAL ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) [PROPOSED] vs. ) TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., ) ORDER ) A California corporation, SAATCHI & ) SAATCHI NORTH AMERICA, INC., ) a Delaware corporation; SMUGGLER, INC., ) a California corporation, DOES 1 through ) ) X; and ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through ) X, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 18 19 Plaintiff Eric E. Dahl, by and through his counsel Jeffrey Galliher, and Defendants 20 Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc., Saatchi & Saatchi North America, Inc., and Smuggler, Inc. 21 (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their counsel Hutchison & Steffen and Steptoe & 22 Johnson, submitted a stipulation to dismiss this case with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 on May 23 28, 2015. (Doc. 34.) 24 25 26 IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice with each of the parties to bear their own attorney fees and costs. Dated: May _____, 2015 28, 2015. 27 28 _____________________________ United States District Court Judge Case 2:14-cv-01737-JCM-PAL Document 35 Filed 05/28/15 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 and LR 5-1, I hereby certify that on May 27, 2015, I caused 3 a copy of the PROPOSED ORDER, to be served via CM/ECF and U.S. Mail upon the 4 following counsel: 5 6 7 8 Jeffrey L. Galliher, Esq. Law Offices of Steven M. Burris 2810 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite F-58 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Jacob A. Reynolds____________ Of Counsel at Hutchison & Steffen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?