McKenna v. David Z. Chesnoff, Chtd. P.C. et al
Filing
55
ORDER Granting 54 Stipulation for Extension of Briefing Schedule re 53 MOTION to compel IME of Plaintiff Michelle McKenna. Responses due by 8/15/2016, Replies due by 8/25/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 54 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DENNIS L. KENNEDY
Nevada Bar No. 1462
SARAH E. HARMON
Nevada Bar No. 8106
KELLY B. STOUT
Nevada Bar No. 12105
AMANDA L. STEVENS
Nevada Bar No. 13966
BAILEYKENNEDY
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302
Telephone: 702.562.8820
Facsimile: 702.562.8821
DKennedy@BaileyKennedy.com
SHarmon@BaileyKennedy.com
KStout@BaileyKennedy.com
AStevens@BaileyKennedy.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHELLE MCKENNA
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13 MICHELLE MCKENNA,
Plaintiff,
14
Case No. 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH
vs.
15
16 DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, CHTD. P.C. d/b/a
CHESNOFF & SCHONFELD; DAVID Z.
17 CHESNOFF; and RICHARD A. SCHONFELD,
Defendants.
18
19
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAM OF
PLAINTIFF MICHELLE McKENNA
21
(First Request)
22
23
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, IA 6-2, 7-1, Plaintiff Michelle McKenna (“Ms. McKenna”)
24
and Defendants David Z. Chesnoff, Chtd. P.C. d/b/a Chesnoff & Schonfeld; David Z. Chesnoff; and
25
Richard A. Schonfeld (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
26
27
28
1.
On July 1, 2016, Defendants filed their Motion to Compel Independent Medical
Exam of Plaintiff Michelle McKenna (“Motion”) [ ECF No. 53].
2.
The current deadline for Ms. McKenna to respond to the Motion is July 18, 2016.
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 54 Filed 07/15/16 Page 2 of 3
1
3.
For the past six weeks, the Parties have delayed further discovery in order to engage
2
in informal settlement negotiations. See Order to Extd. Discov. (Fourth Req.), May 24, 2016 [ECF
3
No. 51].
4
4.
Although the Parties have not yet reached a settlement, they have agreed to continue
5
their ongoing settlement discussions by scheduling a mediation with Hon. Jackie Glass (Ret.) on
6
July 26, 2016.
7
5.
In order to: (i) avoid incurring potentially unnecessary costs and fees while the
8
parties attempt to negotiate a settlement; and (ii) allow the Parties time to attend the mediation, and,
9
if successful, finalize a settlement agreement, the Parties stipulate and agree to extend the briefing
10
schedule for the Motion as follows:
11
///
12
///
13
///
14
///
15
///
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 54 Filed 07/15/16 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
4
A. Ms. McKenna will file a Response to the Motion on or before August 15,
2016; and
B. The Defendants will file a Reply in support of the Motion on or before
August 25, 2016.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DATED this 15th day of July, 2016.
DATED this 15th day of July, 2016.
By: /s/ Kelly B. Stout
_
DENNIS L. KENNEDY
SARAH E. HARMON
KELLY B. STOUT
AMANDA L. STEVENS
BAILEYKENNEDY
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302
By: /s/ Brian K. Terry
_
BRIAN K. TERRY
SEAN D. COONEY
THORNDAL, ARMSTRONG, DELK,
BALKENBUSH & EISINGER
1100 East Bridger Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHELLE MCKENNA
Attorneys for Defendants
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, CHTD. P.C. d/b/a
CHESNOFF & SCHONFELD; DAVID Z.
CHESNOFF; and RICHARD A. SCHONFELD
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED:
15
_____
16
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
Dated:
18
19
Respectfully Submitted by:
20
BAILEYKENNEDY
21
July 18, 2016
By: /s/ Kelly B. Stout_
DENNIS L. KENNEDY
SARAH E. HARMON
KELLY B. STOUT
AMANDA L. STEVENS
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302
22
23
24
25
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHELLE MCKENNA
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?