McKenna v. David Z. Chesnoff, Chtd. P.C. et al

Filing 55

ORDER Granting 54 Stipulation for Extension of Briefing Schedule re 53 MOTION to compel IME of Plaintiff Michelle McKenna. Responses due by 8/15/2016, Replies due by 8/25/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 54 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DENNIS L. KENNEDY Nevada Bar No. 1462 SARAH E. HARMON Nevada Bar No. 8106 KELLY B. STOUT Nevada Bar No. 12105 AMANDA L. STEVENS Nevada Bar No. 13966 BAILEYKENNEDY 8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302 Telephone: 702.562.8820 Facsimile: 702.562.8821 DKennedy@BaileyKennedy.com SHarmon@BaileyKennedy.com KStout@BaileyKennedy.com AStevens@BaileyKennedy.com Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHELLE MCKENNA 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 MICHELLE MCKENNA, Plaintiff, 14 Case No. 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH vs. 15 16 DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, CHTD. P.C. d/b/a CHESNOFF & SCHONFELD; DAVID Z. 17 CHESNOFF; and RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, Defendants. 18 19 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAM OF PLAINTIFF MICHELLE McKENNA 21 (First Request) 22 23 Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, IA 6-2, 7-1, Plaintiff Michelle McKenna (“Ms. McKenna”) 24 and Defendants David Z. Chesnoff, Chtd. P.C. d/b/a Chesnoff & Schonfeld; David Z. Chesnoff; and 25 Richard A. Schonfeld (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 26 27 28 1. On July 1, 2016, Defendants filed their Motion to Compel Independent Medical Exam of Plaintiff Michelle McKenna (“Motion”) [ ECF No. 53]. 2. The current deadline for Ms. McKenna to respond to the Motion is July 18, 2016. Page 1 of 3 Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 54 Filed 07/15/16 Page 2 of 3 1 3. For the past six weeks, the Parties have delayed further discovery in order to engage 2 in informal settlement negotiations. See Order to Extd. Discov. (Fourth Req.), May 24, 2016 [ECF 3 No. 51]. 4 4. Although the Parties have not yet reached a settlement, they have agreed to continue 5 their ongoing settlement discussions by scheduling a mediation with Hon. Jackie Glass (Ret.) on 6 July 26, 2016. 7 5. In order to: (i) avoid incurring potentially unnecessary costs and fees while the 8 parties attempt to negotiate a settlement; and (ii) allow the Parties time to attend the mediation, and, 9 if successful, finalize a settlement agreement, the Parties stipulate and agree to extend the briefing 10 schedule for the Motion as follows: 11 /// 12 /// 13 /// 14 /// 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Page 2 of 3 Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 54 Filed 07/15/16 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 A. Ms. McKenna will file a Response to the Motion on or before August 15, 2016; and B. The Defendants will file a Reply in support of the Motion on or before August 25, 2016. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DATED this 15th day of July, 2016. DATED this 15th day of July, 2016. By: /s/ Kelly B. Stout _ DENNIS L. KENNEDY SARAH E. HARMON KELLY B. STOUT AMANDA L. STEVENS BAILEYKENNEDY 8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302 By: /s/ Brian K. Terry _ BRIAN K. TERRY SEAN D. COONEY THORNDAL, ARMSTRONG, DELK, BALKENBUSH & EISINGER 1100 East Bridger Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHELLE MCKENNA Attorneys for Defendants DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, CHTD. P.C. d/b/a CHESNOFF & SCHONFELD; DAVID Z. CHESNOFF; and RICHARD A. SCHONFELD 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 _____ 16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 Dated: 18 19 Respectfully Submitted by: 20 BAILEYKENNEDY 21 July 18, 2016 By: /s/ Kelly B. Stout_ DENNIS L. KENNEDY SARAH E. HARMON KELLY B. STOUT AMANDA L. STEVENS 8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302 22 23 24 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHELLE MCKENNA 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?