McKenna v. David Z. Chesnoff, Chtd. P.C. et al

Filing 85

ORDER Granting 74 Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule re 72 Objection to Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 74 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

DENNIS L. KENNEDY
Nevada Bar No. 1462
SARAH E. HARMON
Nevada Bar No. 8106
KELLY B. STOUT
Nevada Bar No. 12105
AMANDA L. STEVENS
Nevada Bar No. 13966
BAILEYKENNEDY
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.562.8821
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHELLE MCKENNA

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12
13 MICHELLE MCKENNA,

Plaintiff,

14

Case No. 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH

vs.

15

16 DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, CHTD. P.C. d/b/a
CHESNOFF & SCHONFELD; DAVID Z.
17 CHESNOFF; and RICHARD A. SCHONFELD,
Defendants.

18
19

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, CHTD. P.C. D/B/A CHESNOFF & SCHONFELD’S
OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL INDEPENDENT
MEDICAL EXAM OF PLAINTIFF MICHELLE MCKENNA

20
21
22
23

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-2 and 7-1, Plaintiff Michelle McKenna (“Ms. McKenna”) and

24

Defendants David Z. Chesnoff, Chtd. P.C. d/b/a Chesnoff & Schonfeld (“Chesnoff & Schonfeld”);

25

David Z. Chesnoff; and Richard A. Schonfeld (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate and

26

agree to the following briefing schedule:

27
28

1.

On July 1, 2016, Defendant Chesnoff & Schonfeld filed its Motion to Compel

Independent Medical Exam of Plaintiff Michelle McKenna (“Motion”) [ECF No. 53].
Page 1 of 3

Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 74 Filed 09/08/16 Page 2 of 3

1
2
3

2.

On August 22, 2016, Ms. McKenna filed her Sealed Response to Motion to Compel

Independent Medical Exam of Plaintiff Michelle McKenna (“Response”) [ECF No. 62].
3.

On September 1, 2016, Chesnoff & Schonfeld filed its Reply to Plaintiff’s

4

Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Independent Medical Exam of Plaintiff Michelle

5

McKenna (“Reply”) [ECF No. 71].

6

4.

On September 1, 2016, Defendant Chesnoff & Schonfeld filed its Objections to

7

Evidence Submitted in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel

8

Independent Medical Exam of Plaintiff Michelle McKenna (“Objections”) [ECF No. 72].

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

5.

Neither the FRCP nor the Local Rules expressly provide for briefing on the

Objections.
6.

Accordingly, the Parties request that the Court set a briefing schedule on the

Objections and stipulate and agree as follows:
A. Ms. McKenna shall have up to and including September 16, 2016 to file a
Response to the Objections.
B. Chesnoff & Schonfeld shall have up to and including September 23, 2016 file a
Reply in Support of the Objections.

17

DATED this 8th day of September, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of September, 2016.

18

By: /s/ Kelly B. Stout
DENNIS L. KENNEDY
SARAH E. HARMON
KELLY B. STOUT
AMANDA L. STEVENS
BAILEYKENNEDY
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302

By: /s/ Sean D. Cooney
BRIAN K. TERRY
SEAN D. COONEY
THORNDAL, ARMSTRONG, DELK,
BALKENBUSH & EISINGER
1100 East Bridger Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHELLE MCKENNA

Attorneys for Defendants
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, CHTD. P.C. d/b/a
CHESNOFF & SCHONFELD; DAVID Z.
CHESNOFF; and RICHARD A. SCHONFELD

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
September 9, 2016
Dated:
Page 2 of 3

Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 74 Filed 09/08/16 Page 3 of 3

1

Respectfully Submitted by:

2

BAILEYKENNEDY

3

By: /s/ Kelly B. Stout
DENNIS L. KENNEDY
SARAH E. HARMON
KELLY B. STOUT
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHELLE MCKENNA

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 3 of 3