McKenna v. David Z. Chesnoff, Chtd. P.C. et al

Filing 99

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Court having received 98 the notice of withdrawal of motion to quash filed by non-parties Paul S. Padda, Esq. and Ruth L. Cohen, Esq., it is hereby ordered that 96 Defendant's motion to strike is denied as moo t. Further, based upon the representations of counsel for non-parties Paul S. Padda, Esq. and Ruth L. Cohen, Esq., 95 the motion to quash is also denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 98 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 2

1

Paul S. Padda, Esq. (NV Bar #10417)
Email: [e-mail]

2

PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC

3

4240 West Flamingo Road, Suite 220
Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
Tele: [phone]

4

Fax:[phone]
Web: paulpaddalaw.com

5

Attorney for Plaintiff
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
MICHELLE McKENNA,
9

Plaintiff,
10

)
vs.

11
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF. CHTD. P.C. d/b/a.

12
13

)
)
)

CFIESNOFF & SCHONFELD:
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF; and RICHARD A.
SCHONFELD,

14

Defendants.

Case No. 2:14-cv-1773-JAD-CWH

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

15

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO QUASH BY NON16

PARTIES RUTH L. COHEN. ESQ. AND PAUL S. PADDA. ESQ.

17

Pending before the Court is a motion to quash1 filed by non-parties Paul S. Padda, Esq.

18

and Ruth L. Cohen, Esq. The motion was filed because (1) undersigned counsel understood that

19

there were certain privilege issues that had not been resolved between counsel for Defendants

20

and Plaintiff and (2) because movants' depositions had been unilaterally scheduled during the

21

week preceding the New Year which was both inconvenient for the moving parties as well as

22

counsel for Plaintiff.

23
24

Undersigned counsel wishes to advise the Court that the moving parties hereby withdraw
their pending motion. In light of the foregoing, the opposition and motion to strike filed by

25

26

Pacer #95.

Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 98 Filed 01/18/17 Page 2 of 2

1

defense counsel are moot. Undersigned counsel has proposed dates for the depositions to

2

proceed and it is his understanding that the privilege issues have been resolved between counsel

3

for Defendants and Plaintiff.

4

Respectfully submitted.

5

/s/ PcuMs S. fcuidas

6

Paul S. Padda, Esq.

7

Attorney for Ruth Cohen and Paul Padda

8

Dated: January 18, 2017

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED:

13

The Court having received the notice of
withdrawal of motion to quash filed by non
parties Paul S. Padda, Esq. and Ruth L. Cohen,
Esq., it is hereby ordered that Defendant's
motion to strike (Pacer #96) is denied as moot.
Further, based upon the representations of
counsel for non-parties Paul S. Padda, Esq. and

14

Ruth L. Cohen, Esq., the motion to quash (Pacer
#95) is also denied as moot.

11
12

15

16

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
Dated:

January 19, 2017

18
19

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
20
In accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's Local Rules, the
21

undersigned hereby certifies that on January 18, 2017 the foregoing document was served upon
all parties and counsel of record in this matter through the Court's CM/ECF filing system.

22
23

/s/ PiU/cL S. Pcuidoy

24

Paul S. Padda, Esq.

25
26

2