McKenna v. David Z. Chesnoff, Chtd. P.C. et al
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Court having received 98 the notice of withdrawal of motion to quash filed by non-parties Paul S. Padda, Esq. and Ruth L. Cohen, Esq., it is hereby ordered that 96 Defendant's motion to strike is denied as moo t. Further, based upon the representations of counsel for non-parties Paul S. Padda, Esq. and Ruth L. Cohen, Esq., 95 the motion to quash is also denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 98 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 2
Paul S. Padda, Esq. (NV Bar #10417)
PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC
4240 West Flamingo Road, Suite 220
Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF. CHTD. P.C. d/b/a.
CFIESNOFF & SCHONFELD:
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF; and RICHARD A.
Case No. 2:14-cv-1773-JAD-CWH
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO QUASH BY NON16
PARTIES RUTH L. COHEN. ESQ. AND PAUL S. PADDA. ESQ.
Pending before the Court is a motion to quash1 filed by non-parties Paul S. Padda, Esq.
and Ruth L. Cohen, Esq. The motion was filed because (1) undersigned counsel understood that
there were certain privilege issues that had not been resolved between counsel for Defendants
and Plaintiff and (2) because movants' depositions had been unilaterally scheduled during the
week preceding the New Year which was both inconvenient for the moving parties as well as
counsel for Plaintiff.
Undersigned counsel wishes to advise the Court that the moving parties hereby withdraw
their pending motion. In light of the foregoing, the opposition and motion to strike filed by
Case 2:14-cv-01773-JAD-CWH Document 98 Filed 01/18/17 Page 2 of 2
defense counsel are moot. Undersigned counsel has proposed dates for the depositions to
proceed and it is his understanding that the privilege issues have been resolved between counsel
for Defendants and Plaintiff.
/s/ PcuMs S. fcuidas
Paul S. Padda, Esq.
Attorney for Ruth Cohen and Paul Padda
Dated: January 18, 2017
IT IS SO ORDERED:
The Court having received the notice of
withdrawal of motion to quash filed by non
parties Paul S. Padda, Esq. and Ruth L. Cohen,
Esq., it is hereby ordered that Defendant's
motion to strike (Pacer #96) is denied as moot.
Further, based upon the representations of
counsel for non-parties Paul S. Padda, Esq. and
Ruth L. Cohen, Esq., the motion to quash (Pacer
#95) is also denied as moot.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
January 19, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
In accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's Local Rules, the
undersigned hereby certifies that on January 18, 2017 the foregoing document was served upon
all parties and counsel of record in this matter through the Court's CM/ECF filing system.
/s/ PiU/cL S. Pcuidoy
Paul S. Padda, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?