Magdaluyo v. MGM Grand Hotel, LLC

Filing 201

ORDER that 193 defendant MGM Grand Hotel, LLC's Objections are DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of MGM Grand Hotel, LLC and against plaintiff Dante Magdaluyo, Jr. on the plaintiff's Ti tle VII, defamation, workplace violence, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. The plaintiff's invasion of privacy claim has been dismissed with prejudice by stipulation between the parties. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/14/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4
5

DANTE B. MAGDALUYO, JR.,
Plaintiff,

6

v.

7

Case No. 2:14-cv-01806-APG-GWF
ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF
JUDGMENT

MGM GRAND HOTEL, LLC,

8

Defendant.

9
10

On February 24, 2017, I granted in part defendant MGM Grand Hotel, LLC’s motion for

11

summary judgment. ECF No. 159. I granted MGM’s motion as to plaintiff Dante Magdaluyo, Jr.’s

12

Title VII, defamation, workplace violence, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims.

13

I denied the motion as to Magdaluyo’s claim for invasion of privacy.

14

The parties recently stipulated to the dismissal with prejudice of Magdaluyo’s invasion of

15

privacy claim. ECF No. 200. In light of that stipulation, I deny MGM’s objections (ECF No. 193)

16

as moot. Additionally, because that was Magdaluyo’s only remaining claim, there are no other

17

claims pending in this case. I thus direct the clerk of court to enter judgment and close this case.

18
19

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant MGM Grand Hotel, LLC’s objections
(ECF No. 193) are DENIED as moot.

20

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of MGM

21

Grand Hotel, LLC and against plaintiff Dante Magdaluyo, Jr. on the plaintiff’s Title VII,

22

defamation, workplace violence, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. The

23

plaintiff’s invasion of privacy claim has been dismissed with prejudice by stipulation between the

24

parties. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

25
26
27
28

DATED this 14th day of August, 2017.
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE