Jevack v. NV Energy, Inc.

Filing 21

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice Granting 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/30/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PATRICK HICKS, ESQ., Bar # 4632 NEIL ALEXANDER, ESQ., Bar #5202 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Facsimile: 702.862.8811 KARYN M. TAYLOR, ESQ., Bar #6142 NV ENERGY 6100 Neil Road Reno, NV 89511 Telephone: 775.834.5781 Facsimile: 775.834.4098 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant NV ENERGY, INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 MARK JEVACK, Case No. 2:14-cv-01856-GMN-CWH Plaintiff, 15 16 vs. 17 NV ENERGY, INC., a Nevada corporation; DOES 1-10, inclusive; ROE CORPORATIONS 1-10, inclusive, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 /// /// 23 /// 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 NV ENERG Y 6100 NEIL ROAD Reno, NV 89511 775.834.5781 /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Plaintiff, MARK 2 JEVACK, through his undersigned counsel, and the Defendant, NV ENERGY, INC., through its 3 undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to 4 bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. 5 6 Dated: December 24, 2014 7 8 By: /s/Karyn M. Taylor KARYN M. TAYLOR, ESQ. PATRICK HICKS, ESQ. NEIL ALEXANDER, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant NV ENERGY, INC. 9 10 Dated: December 24, 2014 11 By: /s/Kirk Kennedy KIRK KENENDY, ESQ. 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK JEVACK 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 16 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 17 DATED:___________________________ 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 _____________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court 21 22 23 DATED: 12/30/2014 24 25 26 27 28 NV ENERG Y 6100 NEIL ROAD Reno, NV 89511 775.834.5781 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?