Williams v. Clark County School District
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice Granting 22 STIPULATION of Dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/27/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
2 S. SCOTT GREENBERG, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4622
3 5100 W. Sahara Ave.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
4 (702) 799-5373
Attorney for Defendant,
5 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
RICHARD WILLIAMS,
9
10
11
12
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01892-RCJ-PAL
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
v.
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT;
and DOES I through X,
inclusive,
13
Defendants.
14
15
COMES NOW, Plaintiff and Defendant Clark County School District
16
(“District”), by and through their attorneys of record, and hereby
17
stipulate and agree to the dismissal of this action in its entirety,
18
with prejudice, and each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s
19
fees.
20
in this action and neither party will seek any attorney’s fees
21
. . .
22
. . .
23
. . .
24
. . .
25
. . .
26
. . .
27
. . .
28
. . .
The parties agree that neither party is a prevailing party
1 or costs pursuant to any rule, statute or law, whether local, state
2 or federal.
3
DATED this 25th day of May, 2015.
4
5
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Office of the General Counsel
HOLMAN LAW OFFICES
6
7 By:
8
/s/ S. Scott Greenberg
S. SCOTT GREENBERG
Nevada Bar No. 4622
5100 W. Sahara Ave.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Attorneys for Defendants
9
By:/s/ Kristina S. Holman
KRISTINA S. HOLMAN
Nevada Bar No. 3742
703 S. Eighth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorney for Plaintiff
10
11
12 IT IS SO ORDERED:
13
14 Date:
IT IS SO ORDERED.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
15
16
17
________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
18
19
DATED: 05/27/2015
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?