Hammons v. Williams et al

Filing 45

ORDER Denying Petitioner's 37 , 38 , and 43 motions and Granting 39 motion. Petitioner's response to Respondents' 35 Motion to Dismiss due by 1/29/2016. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/29/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Benny Hammons, 5 2:14-cv-01902-JAD-GWF Plaintiff 6 v. 7 Order Brian Williams, et al., 8 [ECF 37, 38, 39, 43] Defendants 9 10 This is a habeas corpus petition brought by Nevada state prisoner, Benny Hammons, who 11 is in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC). Hammons moves the court 12 for various relief. I address each request in turn. 13 A. Motion for appointment of counsel 14 I first consider Hammons’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF 43), which 15 respondents oppose. ECF 44. There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for a federal 16 habeas corpus proceeding. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 17 999 F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir. 1993). The decision to appoint counsel is generally discretionary. 18 Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 19 (9th Cir. 1984). Generally, counsel must be appointed only if the complexities of the case are 20 such that denial of counsel would amount to a denial of due process or the petitioner is a person 21 of such limited education that he is incapable of fairly presenting his claims. See Chaney, 801 22 F.2d at 1196; see also Hawkins v. Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th Cir. 1970). 23 Hammons’s amended petition appears to present his issues sufficiently clearly, and the 24 legal issues in this case do not appear to be particularly complex. Therefore, counsel is not 25 justified. Hammons’s request for appointment of counsel is denied. 26 B. 27 28 Motion to compel production of exhibits Next, Hammons moves to compel the production of exhibits. ECF 38. Respondents oppose the motion and provide an affidavit from Southern Desert Correctional Center (SDCC) 1 law library supervisor along with SDCC mail logs that indicate that Hammons received copies of 2 all exhibits filed by respondents in this action. ECF 41, Exhs. A-C. I suspect that the fact the 3 exhibits were filed with respondents’ motion for clarification and later referenced in respondents’ 4 motion to dismiss may have caused some confusion. Hammons did not reply to respondents’ 5 opposition, which also tends to indicate that confusion existed that has now been resolved. 6 Because Hammons was served with all exhibits, his motion to compel is denied. 7 C. 8 9 Motion to extend copywork limit Hammons’s third pending motion is his form motion to extend his prison copywork limit. ECF 37. Respondents oppose this request, too, and they have provided a statement of 10 Hammons’s copywork account balance that the NDOC accounting staff provided. ECF 42, Exh. 11 A. The statement reflects that Hammons has only incurred about $20 in copywork expenses out 12 of the $100 normally allotted by NDOC before a litigant must seek an extension of the copywork 13 limit. Id. Moreover, respondents have provided the exhibits in this case. The record reflects that 14 Hammons has ample copywork allotment at this time to oppose respondents’ motion to dismiss. 15 The motion to extend the copywork limit is denied. 16 D. 17 Motion for extension of time to oppose motion to dismiss Finally, Hammons moves for an extension of time to file his opposition to the motion to 18 dismiss. ECF 39. The motion is granted. Hammons must file his opposition by January 29, 19 2016. 20 Conclusion 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for enlargement of time [ECF 22 39] is GRANTED, but his motion to extend copywork limit, motion to compel, and motion for 23 appointment of counsel [ECF 37, 38, 43] are all DENIED. Petitioner has until January 29, 24 2016, to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss. 25 Dated this 29th day of December, 2015 26 _______________________________ ______________________ _ _ _____ ___ _ Jennifer A. Dorsey nifer Dorsey e rsey United States District Judge ted States ta e Judge u 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?