Cornell v. Bonaventura et al
Filing
76
ORDER that 72 Motion for Entry of Default or to Extend the Deadlines to Serve Defendant John Bonaventura is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. FURTHER ORDERED that 32 Motion to Dismiss/Quash is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/2/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
5
BRYAN CORNELL,
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
Case No. 2:14-cv-01906-APG-GWF
v.
JOHN BONAVENTURA, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
ENTRY OF DEFAULT OR TO
EXTEND SERVICE DEADLINE
Defendants.
(Dkt. ##32, 72)
10
11
12
On March 12, 2015, defendants John Bonaventura and the Office of the Las Vegas
13
Township Constable filed a motion to quash summons and dismiss the complaint. (Dkt. #26.) I
14
granted the motion after plaintiff Bryan Cornell did not file an opposition. (Dkt. #71); LR 7-2(d).
15
Cornell moves for reconsideration only with respect to defendant John Bonaventura.
16
Cornell contends that the quashed proof of service did not state that Bonaventura had been
17
served personally and thus there was no basis to quash as to Bonaventura. Cornell also argues
18
that Bonaventura made a general appearance in this case but he has failed to answer or otherwise
19
respond to the complaint, so default should be entered against him. Alternatively, Cornell
20
requests an extension of time until September 15, 2015 to serve Bonaventura.
21
Cornell filed a proof of service showing defendant Office of the Las Vegas Township
22
Constable had been served by leaving a copy of the complaint and summons with Captain Rich
23
Forbus. (Dkt. #16.) Defendants Bonaventura and the Constable’s Office moved to quash the
24
service and dismiss the complaint. (Dkt. #26.) Cornell did not respond to this motion. He
25
therefore consented to it being granted. LR 7-2(d). Bonaventura and the Constable’s Office filed
26
a notice of non-opposition to indicate that Cornell had not opposed their motion to quash. (Dkt.
27
28
1
#41.) Cornell still did not respond. I granted the motion to quash as unopposed, and therefore
2
Captain Rich Forbus’s motion to quash (Dkt. #32) is moot.
3
Cornell moves to reconsider only as to Bonaventura. Cornell contends that Bonaventura
4
made a general appearance when (1) he moved to quash even though the summons was not
5
directed at him personally and (2) he filed a substitution of attorney indicating that he would
6
proceed pro se and his prior counsel, Robert Pool, no longer would represent him in this action.
7
(Dkt. #58.) Cornell therefore contends default should be entered against Bonaventura because he
8
has not filed an answer or otherwise responded to the complaint.
9
If Cornell thought that Bonaventura’s filing of the motion to quash amounted to a general
10
appearance, he should have presented that argument in response to Bonaventura’s motion to
11
quash. Instead, he chose not to respond to the motion and thereby consented to me granting it.
12
Further, Cornell presents no authority for the proposition that moving to quash or substituting
13
counsel amounts to a personal appearance. I therefore deny Cornell’s motion for entry of default.
14
However, I grant Cornell’s request that I extend the deadline to effect service. Cornell
15
should have moved to extend the service deadline before it expired on May 12, 2015. (Dkt. #31.)
16
I nevertheless will extend the deadline to serve Bonaventura to September 30, 2015.
17
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Bryan Cornell’s motion for entry of default
18
or to extend the deadline to serve defendant John Bonaventura (Dkt. #72) is GRANTED in part
19
and DENIED in part. The motion is granted to the extent that the deadline to serve defendant
20
John Bonaventura is extended to September 30, 2015. The motion is denied in all other respects.
21
22
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss/quash filed by Captain Rich
Forbus (Dkt. #32) is DENIED AS MOOT.
DATED this 2nd day of September, 2015.
24
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?