Nickler v. County of Clark et al

Filing 38

ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/16/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01907-JCM-CWH Document 34 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 2 1 CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 1988 2 C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13225 3 POTTER LAW OFFICES 1125 Shadow Lane 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Tel: (702) 385-1954 5 Fax: (702) 385-9081 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 JACQUELYNN NICKLER 10 Plaintiffs, CASE NO.: 14-cv-1907-APG-CWH 11 vs. 12 COUNTY OF CLARK, organized and of the 13 existing under the laws of State of Nevada; STEVEN D. GRIERSON, court administrator, 14 individually; KATHLEEN LAMBERMONT, administrator of the Clark County District 15 Attorney’s office, individually; and, DOE 1 through 10, inclusive; 16 Defendants. 17 ________________________________________/ 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO 19 DEFENDANTS CLARK COUNTY AND LAMBERMONT’S JOINDER TO MOTION 20 TO DISMISS AND TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY THERETO 21 Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff, Jacquelynn Nickler, by and through her counsel of record 22 Cal J. Potter, III, Esq. and C. J. Potter, IV, Esq. of Potter Law Offices and Defendants, Clark 23 County and Kathleen Lambermont, by and through their counsel of record, Robert. W. 24 Freeman, Esq. and Cayla Witty, Esq. of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, hereby stipulate and 25 request that the scheduled date of filing of Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants Clark County 26 and Lambermont’s Joinder to Motion to Dismiss [doc. 18], previously extended to Thursday, 27 March 26, 2015 be extended six (6) days up to and including Monday, April 13, 2015. In 28 addition the parties seek that Defendants’ Reply thereto be extended to Friday, May 1, 2015. Case 2:14-cv-01907-JCM-CWH Document 34 Filed 04/07/15 Page 2 of 2 1 Plaintiff submits that good cause exists for this extension. Plaintiff previously extended 2 the Response [doc. 23], but at the time of filing and responding to the Motion [doc. 28] 3 Plaintiff’s counsel inadvertently failed to respond to the Joinder. Upon realizing the mistake, 4 Plaintiff’s counsel conferred with Defendants’ counsel who was amenable to a second 5 extension. Defendants also request an extension for their Reply. 6 Based upon the foregoing, the parties request that this Court order the time for the 7 Plaintiff to file her response to the Motion to Dismiss [doc. 12] and Joinder [doc. 18] to 8 Thursday, March 26, 2015. The parties also request that this Court provide a concomitant 9 enlargement of time for the Defendant’s Reply thereto. 10 This is the second request for enlargement of time to file the Response and first request 11 for enlargement of time to file the Reply. These requests are made in good faith and not for the 12 purposes of delay. 13 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT. 14 DATED this 7th day of April, 2015. DATED this 7th day of April, 2015. 15 POTTER LAW OFFICES LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP 16 By: /s/ C. J. Potter, IV, Esq. CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 1988 C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13225 1125 Shadow Lane Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Attorneys for Plaintiff By /s/ Robert W. Freeman, Esq. ROBERT W. FREEMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3062 CAYLA WITTY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12897 6385 South Rainbow Boulevard, Ste. 600 Las Vegas, NV 89118 Attorney for Defendants Clark County and Kathleen Lambermont 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated this ____ day of April, 2015. April 16, 2015. 28 _____________________________________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?