Scafidi v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 111

ORDER granting ECF No. 110 Stipulation to Extend Time : Response to ECF No. 107 Motion for Summary Judgment due by 6/29/2022. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/16/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Case 2:14-cv-01933-RCJ-GWF Document 111 Filed 05/16/22 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

MARINO SCAFIDI,
Individually,

)
Case No: 2:14-cv-01933-RCJ-GWF
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE )
DEPARTMENT, et al.;
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT
LVMPD’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ECF 107
(First Request)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Plaintiff,
MARINO SCAFIDI, by and through his undersigned counsel, KIRK T.
KENNEDY, ESQ. and GARY A. MODAFFERI, ESQ., and the Defendants LAS VEGAS
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, SGT. S. COMISKEY, DET. K POOL,
DET. R. BEZA, DET A. CHRISTENSEN and CSI K. GRAMMAS by and through their
undersigned counsel, CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ., that the Plaintiff’s opposition to the
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due May 30, 2022, and due to scheduling
concerns and time needed for research and preparation, the Plaintiff has requested
additional time to file his response, and the parties therefore agree to extend the time for
the filing of the Plaintiff’s response to the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment,
ECF 107, for a period of 30 additional days to June 29, 2022.

27

Given the requested time by this stipulation and factoring in the Defendant’s time
28

1

Case 2:14-cv-01933-RCJ-GWF Document 111 Filed 05/16/22 Page 2 of 2

to file a reply, as well as, for the Court to decide the pending motion, the parties stipulate
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

to also vacate and continue the calendar call date of July 5, 2022, and the trial setting of
August 1, 2022, to be reset after the Court’s ruling on the Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment.
This is the first request by the Plaintiff to extend the time for the filing of the
Plaintiff’s response to the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ECF 107.
s/Kirk T. Kennedy
KIRK T. KENNEDY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No: 5032
815 S. Casino Center Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 8910
[phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/Craig R. Anderson
CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No: 6882
Marquis Aurbach & Coffing
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
[phone]
Attorney for LVMPD Defendants

Dated: 5/16/22

Dated: 5/16/22

10
11
12

15

/s/Gary A. Modafferi
GARY A. MODAFFERI, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No: 12450
815 S. Casino Center Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
[phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff

16

Dated: 5/16/22

13
14

17
18
19
20
21

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 16th day of May, 2022.

22
23

__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

2