Adkisson v. Neven et al
Filing
56
ORDER Granting 55 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time (Third Request) to File a Reply to 49 Answer to Amended Habeas Petition. Reply due by 8/21/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 6
1
7
RENE L. VALLADARES
Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 11479
JASON F. CARR
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 006587
411 E. Bonneville, Ste. 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 388-6577
(702) 388-5819 (fax)
Jason_carr@fd.org
8
Attorney for Petitioner
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
MICHAEL DEAN ADKISSON,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
D.W. NEVEN,
15
Case No. 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
REPLY TO ANSWER
(Third Request)
Respondents.
ORDER
16
17
Petitioner Michael Dean Adkisson, by and through his counsel of record, Assistant
18
Federal Public Defender Jason F. Carr, hereby moves this Court for an extension of time
19
of forty-five (45) days from July 7, 2017, to and including August 21, 2017, to file his
20
21
22
23
24
///
25
///
26
///
Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 2 of 6
1
Reply to Respondents’ Answer. This motion is based upon the attached declaration of
2
counsel and the files and records in this case.
3
DATED this 7th day of July, 2017.
4
Respectfully submitted,
RENE L. VALLADARES
Federal Public Defender
5
6
7
/s/ Megan C. Hoffman for:
8
JASON F. CARR
Assistant Federal Public Defender
9
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED:
14
15
16
______________________________
United States District Judge
17
18
7/17/2017
Dated: ________________________
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DECLARATION OF MEGAN C. HOFFMAN
STATE OF NEVADA
COUNTY OF CLARK
)
)
)
ss:
I, MEGAN C. HOFFMAN, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the
following is true and correct:
1.
I am the Chief of the Non-Capital Habeas Unit. I submit this
8
Declaration on behalf of Assistant Federal Defender Jason Carr, who is in Northern
9
Nevada today. Mr. Carr is filing a Notice of Representation of Mr. Adkisson
10
11
12
13
contemporaneously with this motion.
2.
On August 25, 2015, Attorney Melanie Gavisk filed Mr. Adkisson’s First
Amended Petition and Supporting Exhibits in this matter. ECF Nos. 16-21.
3.
On February 10, 2016, Ms. Gavisk also filed Mr. Adkisson’s Second
14
Amended Petition, Supporting Exhibits, and a Notice of Manual Filing. ECF Nos. 28-
15
30. On May 16, 2016, Respondents filed their Motion to Dismiss and Supporting
16
Exhibits. ECF 36-42. On August 1, 2016, Mr. Adkisson filed his Opposition to
17
Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF 45. On August 4, 2016, Respondents filed their
18
Reply to the Opposition. ECF 46. On February 13, 2017, this Court issued an order
19
denying Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 48.
20
21
22
23
24
25
4.
Attorney Gavisk left her employment with the office of the Federal
Public Defender (FPD) in or around August 2016.
5.
On August 9, 2016, Attorney Armilla Staley-Ngomo (AFD) filed an
appearance as counsel of record for Mr. Adkisson.
6.
Respondents filed their Answer on March 29, 2017. ECF No. 49. Mr.
Adkisson' has sought and was granted two extensions of time to file the Reply to
26
3
Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 4 of 6
1
Answer. ECF Nos. 50-53. Mr. Adkisson’s Reply to Respondent’s Answer is currently
2
due on July 7, 2017.
3
7.
Ms. Staley-Ngomo accepted employment with another out-of-state FPD
4
Office. Her last official day with the FPD Office in Las Vegas is July 7, 2017. Ms.
5
Staley-Ngomo is completing a draft of the Reply, however she and Mr. Carr require
6
additional time to finalize the Reply and to speak with Mr. Adkisson as a result of
7
the transition.
8
8.
Mr. Carr counsel was out of the office July 4-7, 2017 (for the holiday
9
(July 4), with an illness (July 5), to attend a hearing in the state court of Reno, Nevada
10
(July 6, 2017), and to conduct multiple client visits in Northern Nevada (July 7, 2017).
11
9.
I have been in contact with Ms. Staley-Ngomo and Mr. Carr about the
12
Reply in this matter. Ms. Staley-Ngomo is preparing a draft, which Mr. Carr will
13
review and discuss with Mr. Adkisson before filing. This is a complex case. The
14
Respondents’s Answer to the Petition is 64 pages in length. Mr. Carr requires
15
additional time to review the Reply and to communicate with Mr. Adkisson. The
16
requested extension of time is therefore necessary to effectively and thoroughly
17
represent Mr. Adkisson.
18
10.
For the reasons stated above, Mr. Carr asks this Court to grant hi
19
request for an extension of time of forty-fove (45) days and order the Reply to
20
Respondents’ Answer to be filed on or before August 21, 2017. This motion is not filed
21
for the purposes of delay but in the interests of justice, as well as in the interests of
22
Mr. Adkisson. This is counsel’s third request for an extension for this pleading.
23
11.
On June 29, 2017, our office was advised that counsel for Respondents,
24
Mr. Johnson, is out of the office on extended leave. I contacted a legal secretary,
25
Laurie Sparman, and the habeas supervisor, Heidi Stern, at the Office of the Attorney
26
General by email on July 7, 2017 to inquire about representing Mr. Johnson’s position
4
Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 5 of 6
1
with respect to this motion. Ms. Sparman responded that Mr. Johnson is not opposed
2
to this request. His non-opposition does not signify an implied waiver of any
3
procedural defenses.
4
5
6
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated this 7th day of July, 2017.
7
Respectfully submitted,
RENE L. VALLADARES
Federal Public Defender
8
9
10
/s/ Megan C. Hoffman
11
Assistant Federal Public Defender
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?