Adkisson v. Neven et al

Filing 56

ORDER Granting 55 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time (Third Request) to File a Reply to 49 Answer to Amended Habeas Petition. Reply due by 8/21/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 6 1 7 RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 11479 JASON F. CARR Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 006587 411 E. Bonneville, Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 (702) 388-5819 (fax) Jason_carr@fd.org 8 Attorney for Petitioner 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 MICHAEL DEAN ADKISSON, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 D.W. NEVEN, 15 Case No. 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO ANSWER (Third Request) Respondents. ORDER 16 17 Petitioner Michael Dean Adkisson, by and through his counsel of record, Assistant 18 Federal Public Defender Jason F. Carr, hereby moves this Court for an extension of time 19 of forty-five (45) days from July 7, 2017, to and including August 21, 2017, to file his 20 21 22 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 2 of 6 1 Reply to Respondents’ Answer. This motion is based upon the attached declaration of 2 counsel and the files and records in this case. 3 DATED this 7th day of July, 2017. 4 Respectfully submitted, RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender 5 6 7 /s/ Megan C. Hoffman for: 8 JASON F. CARR Assistant Federal Public Defender 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 15 16 ______________________________ United States District Judge 17 18 7/17/2017 Dated: ________________________ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DECLARATION OF MEGAN C. HOFFMAN STATE OF NEVADA COUNTY OF CLARK ) ) ) ss: I, MEGAN C. HOFFMAN, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct: 1. I am the Chief of the Non-Capital Habeas Unit. I submit this 8 Declaration on behalf of Assistant Federal Defender Jason Carr, who is in Northern 9 Nevada today. Mr. Carr is filing a Notice of Representation of Mr. Adkisson 10 11 12 13 contemporaneously with this motion. 2. On August 25, 2015, Attorney Melanie Gavisk filed Mr. Adkisson’s First Amended Petition and Supporting Exhibits in this matter. ECF Nos. 16-21. 3. On February 10, 2016, Ms. Gavisk also filed Mr. Adkisson’s Second 14 Amended Petition, Supporting Exhibits, and a Notice of Manual Filing. ECF Nos. 28- 15 30. On May 16, 2016, Respondents filed their Motion to Dismiss and Supporting 16 Exhibits. ECF 36-42. On August 1, 2016, Mr. Adkisson filed his Opposition to 17 Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF 45. On August 4, 2016, Respondents filed their 18 Reply to the Opposition. ECF 46. On February 13, 2017, this Court issued an order 19 denying Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 48. 20 21 22 23 24 25 4. Attorney Gavisk left her employment with the office of the Federal Public Defender (FPD) in or around August 2016. 5. On August 9, 2016, Attorney Armilla Staley-Ngomo (AFD) filed an appearance as counsel of record for Mr. Adkisson. 6. Respondents filed their Answer on March 29, 2017. ECF No. 49. Mr. Adkisson' has sought and was granted two extensions of time to file the Reply to 26 3 Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 4 of 6 1 Answer. ECF Nos. 50-53. Mr. Adkisson’s Reply to Respondent’s Answer is currently 2 due on July 7, 2017. 3 7. Ms. Staley-Ngomo accepted employment with another out-of-state FPD 4 Office. Her last official day with the FPD Office in Las Vegas is July 7, 2017. Ms. 5 Staley-Ngomo is completing a draft of the Reply, however she and Mr. Carr require 6 additional time to finalize the Reply and to speak with Mr. Adkisson as a result of 7 the transition. 8 8. Mr. Carr counsel was out of the office July 4-7, 2017 (for the holiday 9 (July 4), with an illness (July 5), to attend a hearing in the state court of Reno, Nevada 10 (July 6, 2017), and to conduct multiple client visits in Northern Nevada (July 7, 2017). 11 9. I have been in contact with Ms. Staley-Ngomo and Mr. Carr about the 12 Reply in this matter. Ms. Staley-Ngomo is preparing a draft, which Mr. Carr will 13 review and discuss with Mr. Adkisson before filing. This is a complex case. The 14 Respondents’s Answer to the Petition is 64 pages in length. Mr. Carr requires 15 additional time to review the Reply and to communicate with Mr. Adkisson. The 16 requested extension of time is therefore necessary to effectively and thoroughly 17 represent Mr. Adkisson. 18 10. For the reasons stated above, Mr. Carr asks this Court to grant hi 19 request for an extension of time of forty-fove (45) days and order the Reply to 20 Respondents’ Answer to be filed on or before August 21, 2017. This motion is not filed 21 for the purposes of delay but in the interests of justice, as well as in the interests of 22 Mr. Adkisson. This is counsel’s third request for an extension for this pleading. 23 11. On June 29, 2017, our office was advised that counsel for Respondents, 24 Mr. Johnson, is out of the office on extended leave. I contacted a legal secretary, 25 Laurie Sparman, and the habeas supervisor, Heidi Stern, at the Office of the Attorney 26 General by email on July 7, 2017 to inquire about representing Mr. Johnson’s position 4 Case 2:14-cv-01934-APG-CWH Document 55 Filed 07/07/17 Page 5 of 6 1 with respect to this motion. Ms. Sparman responded that Mr. Johnson is not opposed 2 to this request. His non-opposition does not signify an implied waiver of any 3 procedural defenses. 4 5 6 I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 7th day of July, 2017. 7 Respectfully submitted, RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender 8 9 10 /s/ Megan C. Hoffman 11 Assistant Federal Public Defender 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?