Barnes v. Nevens et al
Filing
31
ORDER Granting 27 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 25 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 12/14/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
7
RENE L. VALLADARES
Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 11479
JASON F. CARR
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 06587
411 E. Bonneville, Ste. 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 388-6577
(702) 388-5819 (fax)
Jason_Carr@fd.org
8
Attorney for Petitioner Demar Barnes
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
DEMAR RAHYMES BARNES,
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
15
D.W. NEVEN, et al.,
Respondents.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Case No. 2:14-cv-01946-RFB-PAL
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO
RESPONDENTS
MOTION
TO
DISMISS
(SECOND REQUEST)
The Petitioner, Demar Rahymes Barnes, by and through his attorney of record,
Jason F. Carr, Assistant Federal Public Defender, moves this Court for an
enlargement of time of eight (8) days from December 6, 2016, to December 14, 2016
to, in which to file an Opposition to Respondents Motion to Dismiss. This motion is
based upon the attached points and authorities and all pleadings and papers on file
herein.
///
///
///
1
DATED this 6th day of December 2016.
2
Respectfully submitted,
RENE L. VALLADARES
Federal Public Defender
3
4
5
/s/ Jason F. Carr
6
JASON F. CARR
Assistant Federal Public Defender
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
1
2
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1.
On March 31, 2016, the Law Office of the Federal Public Defender “FPD”
3
was appointed to represent Petitioner in the above-entitled action. (See ECF No. 11.)
4
After the Federal Public Defender Office conducted a conflict check and it was
5
determined that there were no conflicts, Assistant Federal Public Defender Jason F.
6
Carr filed his Notice of Representation on April 15, 2016. (See ECF No. 12.) On
7
September 29, 2016, Barnes filed his Amended Petition and supporting exhibits. (See
8
ECF Nos. 21, 22.) Respondents filed their Motion to Dismiss on October 25, 2016.
9
(See ECF No. 25.) Counsel for Petitioner requested an extension of time of twenty-
10
five day to file the Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. (See ECF No. 26.) This is the
11
second request for an extension of time.
12
2.
The additional period of time is necessary in order to effectively and
13
thoroughly represent Mr. Barnes. This motion is not filed for the purposes of delay
14
but in the interests of justice, as well as in the interests of Mr. Barnes.
15
3.
An extension of time to file the Reply is necessary given my obligations
16
in other cases, including: a Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed
17
on October 28, 2016 in Gallegos v. Baca, Nevada District Court No. 3:15-cv-00254-
18
RCJ-VPC; an Opposition to Dismiss filed on November 2, 2016 in Hawes v. Palmer,
19
Nevada District Court No. 3:10-cv-00655-RCJ-VPC; an Oral Argument on November
20
17, 2016 in USA v. Toliver, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals No. 15-15439; an
21
Opposition to Motion to Strike filed November 22, 2016 in Peters v. Neven, Nevada
22
District Court No. 2:14-cv-1055-RFB-VCF; an Opposition to Motion to Dismiss in
23
Barnes v. Neven, Nevada District Court No. 2:14-cv-01946-RFB-PAL, due December
24
6, 2016; an Opening Brief in Shropshire v. Baca, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals No.
25
16-15214, due December 8, 2016; and a Reply in Ramirez v. Baker, Nevada District
26
Court No. 3:13-cv-00025-MMD-VPC, due December 12, 2016.
3
1
4.
Counsel also had to travel to Carson City, and Lovelock, Nevada, on
2
December 1-3, 2016, to conduct needed visits with clients whom also have large
3
pending deadlines.
4
5.
On December 6, 2016, I attempted to contact Deputy Attorney General
5
Victor H. Schulze about this request. Mr. Schulze did not have time to get back to me,
6
but generally counsel for the Respondents does not oppose unduly repetitive or long
7
requests for an extension of time. The State of Nevada does, however, request that
8
counsel for habeas petitioners make clear that nothing about the decision not to
9
oppose Petitioner’s extension request signifies an implied finding of a basis for tolling
10
any applicable period of limitations or the waiver of any other procedural defense.
11
Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating any limitations periods and
12
understands that, in granting an extension request, the Court makes no finding or
13
representation that the petition, any amendments thereto, and/or any claims
14
contained therein are not subject to dismissal as untimely.
15
6.
This motion is not filed for the purpose of delay, but in the interests of
16
justice, as well as in the interest of Mr. Barnes. I respectfully request that this Court
17
grant the request for an extension of time to file the Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
18
to December 14, 2016, to ensure the effective and thorough representation of Mr.
19
Barnes.
20
DATED this 6th Day of December 2016.
21
22
Respectfully submitted,
RENE L. VALLADARES
Federal Public Defender
23
24
/s/ Jason F. Carr
25
JASON F. CARR
Assistant Federal Public Defender
26
4
1
IT IS SO ORDERED:
2
IT IS SO ORDERED:
3
4
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
__________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
DATED: ___________________________
United States District Judge
7
DATED this 29th day of December, 2016.
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
In accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned hereby
certifies that on this 6th day of December 2016, I electronically filed a true and correct
copy of the foregoing with the United States District Court. Electronic service of the
foregoing document shall be made in accordance with the master service list as
follows:
Victor-Hugo Schulze, II
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Special Prosecutions Division
555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068
VSchulze@ag.nv.gov
12
13
/s/Jason F. Carr
14
Assistant Federal Public Defender
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?