Perryman v. Colvin

Filing 17

ORDER Granting 16 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond/Reply re 15 MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration.Responses due by 5/22/2015. Replies due by 6/5/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01951-GMN-GWF Document 16 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada SUNDEEP R. PATEL, SBN CAL 242284 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8981 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Sundeep.Patel@ssa.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 EMILY PERRYMAN 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01951-GMN-GWF ) ) ) UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ) EXTENSION OF TIME ) (FIRST REQUEST) ) ) ) ) 18 19 Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) 20 respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file its Opposition to Plaintiff’s 21 Motion for Reversal and/or Remand to May 22, 2015; and that any reply by plaintiff will be due June 5, 22 2015. 23 An extension of time is needed because Defendant’s counsel was on leave from March 17 – 24 April 6 and is on work travel from April 13 – April 20. This request is made in good faith with no 25 intention to unduly delay the proceedings. 26 -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel, who has no opposition to this motion, on April 14, 2015. Respectfully submitted this 14th day of April 2015. DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney /s/ Sundeep R. Patel SUNDEEP R. PATEL Special Assistant United States Attorney 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED: 11 12 13 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2- April 15, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?