Perryman v. Colvin
Filing
17
ORDER Granting 16 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond/Reply re 15 MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration.Responses due by 5/22/2015. Replies due by 6/5/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:14-cv-01951-GMN-GWF Document 16 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
SUNDEEP R. PATEL, SBN CAL 242284
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8981
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Sundeep.Patel@ssa.gov
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
EMILY PERRYMAN
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Defendant.
17
)
) Case No. 2:14-cv-01951-GMN-GWF
)
)
)
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
)
EXTENSION OF TIME
)
(FIRST REQUEST)
)
)
)
)
18
19
Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”)
20
respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file its Opposition to Plaintiff’s
21
Motion for Reversal and/or Remand to May 22, 2015; and that any reply by plaintiff will be due June 5,
22
2015.
23
An extension of time is needed because Defendant’s counsel was on leave from March 17 –
24
April 6 and is on work travel from April 13 – April 20. This request is made in good faith with no
25
intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
26
-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel, who has no opposition to this motion,
on April 14, 2015.
Respectfully submitted this 14th day of April 2015.
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
/s/ Sundeep R. Patel
SUNDEEP R. PATEL
Special Assistant United States Attorney
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED:
11
12
13
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
April 15, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?