Taggart v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al

Filing 14

Conditional Transfer Order #1. Signed by MDL Panel on 12/23/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
Case NV/2:14-cv-01963 Document 3 Filed 12/23/14 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: XARELTO (RIVAROXABAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2592 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1) On December 12, 2014, the Panel transferred 20 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2014). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Eldon E Fallon. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana and assigned to Judge Fallon. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Eastern District of Louisiana for the reasons stated in the order of December 12, 2014, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Eldon E Fallon. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Dec 23, 2014 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case NV/2:14-cv-01963 Document 3 Filed 12/23/14 Page 2 of 3 IN RE: XARELTO (RIVAROXABAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2592 SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION 14−00522 Banks v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al ALABAMA SOUTHERN ALS 1 CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 14−09056 Iris Crawford v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 4 14−04972 Jonas v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CAS CAS 3 3 14−02523 14−02624 Tonyan v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al Haney v. Bayer AG et al 1 14−03046 Harding et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC 14−00655 14−01794 Lindsey v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al Hoffman v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al COLORADO CO FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM FLM 2 6 GEORGIA NORTHERN GAN 3 14−00182 GAN 4 14−00267 Sinclair et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al West v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al 14−08524 Van Dorn, Jr. v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al ILLINOIS NORTHERN ILN 1 Case NV/2:14-cv-01963 Document 3 Filed 12/23/14 Page 3 of 3 ILLINOIS SOUTHERN ILS ILS ILS ILS ILS ILS 3 3 3 3 3 3 14−01236 14−01254 14−01271 14−01295 14−01299 14−01319 ILS 3 14−01332 Newman v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al Mize v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al Sandusky v. Janssen Research & Development LLC Marrs v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al Moore v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al Danforth v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al Sokol et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al 14−00719 Dragg v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al LOUISIANA MIDDLE LAM 3 LOUISIANA WESTERN LAW 1 14−03080 LAW 6 14−03046 Silvey et al v. Janssen Research & Development L L C et al St Amand et al v. Janssen Research & Development L L C et al 2 14−01963 Taggart v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al 14−00769 Mathena et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al NEVADA NV OHIO SOUTHERN OHS 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?