Sanders v. Williams et al

Filing 12

ORDER that 11 Motion for Enlargement of Time Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Respondents shall have until and including December 17, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to 6 the habeas corpus petition. If respondents file an answer, petitione r shall then have 45 days to file a reply. If respondents file a motion to dismiss, petitioner shall then have 45 days to file a response to the motion to dismiss, and then respondents shall have 20 days to file a reply in support of that motion. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/18/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 DEBARON SANDERS, 9 Petitioner, 10 vs. 11 2:14-cv-01966-JCM-NJK BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., et al., ORDER 12 13 Respondents. _________________________________/ 14 15 In this habeas corpus action, brought by Nevada prisoner Debaron Sanders, the respondents 16 were due to file a response to Sanders’ habeas petition on November 2, 2015. See Order entered 17 September 17, 2015 (ECF No. 10). Respondents did not file a response by that date. 18 On November 10, 2015, respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 11), 19 requesting that the time for their response be extended by 45 days, to December 17, 2015. 20 Respondents’ counsel states that respondents missed the due date for the filing of the response to the 21 petition because of a calendaring error. The court finds that respondents have shown excusable neglect. See LR 6-1(b). The court 22 23 finds, further, that respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for 24 the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of time respondents request. 25 /// 26 /// 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time 2 Nunc Pro Tunc (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED. Respondents shall have until and including 3 December 17, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the habeas corpus petition. If respondents 4 file an answer, petitioner shall then have 45 days to file a reply. If respondents file a motion to 5 dismiss, petitioner shall then have 45 days to file a response to the motion to dismiss, and then 6 respondents shall have 20 days to file a reply in support of that motion. 7 8 November 18, November, 2015. Dated this _____ day of2015. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?