Bodden v. Gentry et al

Filing 93

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that respondents' four motions for extension of time to file their answer (ECF Nos. 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 ) are all GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Case 2:14-cv-01968-RFB-NJK Document 93 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

KAREN BODDEN,

10

Case No. 2:14-cv-01968-RFB-NJK
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
11
JO GENTRY, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14

Karen Bodden’s § 2254 habeas petition is before the court on several motions by

15

respondents for extension of time to file their answer (ECF Nos. 88, 89, 90, 91). Good

16

cause appearing,

17
18

IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ four motions for extension of time to file their
answer (ECF Nos. 88, 89, 90, 91) are all GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

19
20
DATED: 3 December 2020.
21
22
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
1