McCabe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER Granting 38 Stipulation for FRCP 34 Site Inspection. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/21/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01987-JAD-CWH Document 38 Filed 08/20/15 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BRENDA H. ENTZMINGER Nevada Bar No. 9800 AMTOJ S. RANDHAWA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13746 PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLC 504 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 938-1510 Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 SUZY MCCABE, 11 Case No.: 2:14-01987-JAD-CWH Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 WAL-MART STORES, INC., WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET, DOE MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEE, DOE EMPLOYEE, DOE JANITORIAL EMPLOYEE, DOE OWNER, I-V, ROE EMPLOYER, and ROE COMPANIES, 14 15 16 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] ESTABLISHING PARAMETERS FOR FRCP 34 SITE INSPECTION BY PLAINTIFF SUZY MCCABE Defendants. 17 18 19 COME NOW, Plaintiff SUZY MCCABE (“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of record, MORRIS ANDERSON law firm, and Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC. (“Walmart”), by and 20 through its counsel of record, the law firm of PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLC, and 21 pursuant to the provisions of FRCP 34(a)(2)(b)(1), the parties agree, and hereby stipulate, that the 34(a)-(b)(1), 22 inspection shall be conducted within the following parameters: 23 24 At or around 7:00 a.m. on Wednesday, August 26, 2015, at the premises of Walmart Store No. 3355, located at 1400 S. Lamb Blvd, Las Vegas, Nevada (“premises”), Defendant shall permit no 25 26 27 28 more than two (2) individuals from Plaintiff’s counsel’s law firm of record, Morris Anderson, and Plaintiff’s designated expert (collectively, “Plaintiff’s group”) entry upon the premises for the express purposes of inspection, measurement, surveying, photography, and non-destructive and non-invasive -1- Case 2:14-cv-01987-JAD-CWH Document 38 Filed 08/20/15 Page 2 of 3 1 testing of the property. Said inspection, measurement, surveying, photography, co-efficient of friction 2 testing, and non-destructive and non-invasive testing shall be directed to the floor upon which Plaintiff 3 4 allegedly fell on November 4, 2012. This area includes a distance of up to twenty feet in any or all directions from the location of Plaintiff’s alleged fall in the “vegetable area” of the Produce 5 6 7 Department. Plaintiff’s group may remain on the premises for one hour beginning at 7:00 a.m. on August 26, 2015 and ending at 8:00 a.m. on August 26, 2015. 8 Members of Plaintiff’s group may not utilize videotape or video or audio recording of any 9 kind. No member of Plaintiff’s group shall speak to any member of Walmart personnel during the 10 11 inspection. Plaintiff is permitted to photograph only her path of travel to the location at which she allegedly fell and only the location at which she allegedly fell. Plaintiff is not permitted to take any 12 13 14 other photographs. // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 -2- Case 2:14-cv-01987-JAD-CWH Document 38 Filed 08/20/15 Page 3 of 3 1 2 This is a complete and accurate memorialization of the parties’ agreement. No other use of the premises, other than the uses expressly delineated herein, will be permitted. 3 4 Respectfully submitted by: 5 6 DATED: 20th day of August, 2015 DATED: 20th day of August, 2015 7 MORRIS ANDERSON PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLC 8 /s/ Ryan Anderson /s/ Amtoj S. Randhawa 9 RYAN ANDERSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11040 716 S. JONES BLVD. Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 (702) 333-1111 AMTOJ S. RANDHAWA Nevada Bar No. 13746 504 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 938-1510 Attorneys for Plaintiff Suzy McCabe Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 10 11 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: August 21, 2015 17 Dated this _______day of ___________, 2015. 18 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?