Harden v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al

Filing 82

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 77 81 Harden's motions for leave to file supporting affidavits and are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
2

***

3

HAROLD D. HARDEN,
4

Case No. 2:14–cv–2008–JAD–VCF

Plaintiff,
5

vs.

6

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPORTING
et.al.,
AFFIDAVITS (ECF NO. 77); (ECF NO. 81)

7
8

ORDER

Defendants.

9

Before the court are Harden’s motions to file supporting affidavits (ECF No. 77); (ECF No. 81).
10

Harden submitted the declaration of fellow inmate Victor Tagle (ECF No. 77) as well as his own
11
12
13

declaration (ECF No. 81). Harden also submitted several of his completed grievance forms. (ECF No.
81) Harden may supplement his pleadings and motions with additional pleadings, briefs, authorities, or

14

evidence. LR 7-2(g). After reviewing Harden’s motions for leave, this court is unable to determine

15

which motion or motions his the new affidavits were meant to supplement. This court therefore cannot

16

determine if good cause exists to allow Harden’s supplementation. Id.

17

ACCORDINGLY, and for good cause shown,

18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Harden’s motions for leave to file supporting affidavits (ECF No.

19
20

77) and (ECF No. 81) are DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

DATED this 12th day of September, 2016
22

_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25

1