Robinson v. Williams et al

Filing 17

ORDER that 16 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 15 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 9 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of this order to file and serve his response to the motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 CHARLES ERNEST ROBINSON, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 Case No. 2:14-cv-02023-RFB-VCF BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, SR., et al., 14 ORDER Respondents. 15 16 17 This habeas matter is before the court on petitioner’s second motion for appointment of counsel 18 (ECF #16). As this court previously explained, there is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for 19 a federal habeas corpus proceeding. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. 20 Vasquez, 999 F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir.1993). The decision to appoint counsel is generally discretionary. 21 Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 (1987); Bashor v. 22 Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 838 (1984). However, counsel must be 23 appointed if the complexities of the case are such that denial of counsel would amount to a denial of 24 due process, and where the petitioner is a person of such limited education as to be incapable of fairly 25 presenting his claims. See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196; see also Hawkins v. Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th 26 Cir.1970). 27 Petitioner’s form motion provides no further arguments as to why counsel should be appointed 28 in this case. The court has reviewed the docket again and remains of the view that the petition on file 1 in this action appears sufficiently clear in presenting the issues that petitioner wishes to raise. The legal 2 issues do not appear to be particularly complex, and therefore, counsel is not justified. Petitioner’s 3 second motion for counsel is denied. 4 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s second motion for appointment of counsel (ECF #16) is DENIED. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for extension of time to respond to the 7 motion to dismiss (ECF #15) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date 8 of this order to file and serve his response to the motion to dismiss. 9 Dated: July 20, 2015 10 11 12 _______________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?