Villalobos v. Williams et al

Filing 13

ORDER re 7 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due in 30 days, Reply due 20 days after response is filed. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8

GONZALO VILLALOBOS,

9

Petitioner,

10

vs.

11

2:14-cv-02029-RFB-GWF

BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, et al.,

ORDER
12
13

Respondents.
_____________________________/

14
15

In this habeas corpus action, Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) on August 12,

16

2015. The response of Petitioner, Gonzalo Villalobos, was due on August 27, 2015. Villalobos did not

17

file a response by that date.

18
19

The court will, sua sponte, extend, by 30 days from the date of this order, the time for Villalobos’
response to the motion to dismiss.

20

Villalobos is cautioned that, absent extraordinary circumstances, this will be the last extension

21

of this deadline. If Villalobos does not respond to the motion to dismiss in the time allowed by this

22

order, the court will rule on the motion to dismiss without the benefit of a response by Villalobos.

23

See LR 7-2(d) (“The failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion

24

shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion.”).

25
26

The court will also set a 20-day deadline for Respondents to file a reply in support of their
Motion to Dismiss.

1
2
3
4

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of entry of
this order to file a response to Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after Petitioner files a response to the Motion to Dismiss,
Respondents shall have 20 days to file a reply.

5
6

DATED: September 1, 2015.

7
8

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2