Wranik v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Filing
16
ORDER that 15 Motion for Exception to Attendance Requirement for ENE Session is granted in part and denied in part. The Defendant's insurance representative is excused from personal attendance. Peter Wendzel is not excused from personal attendance. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
CHRISTOPHER WRANIK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WYNDHAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC.; )
EMPLOYEE(S)/AGENTS DOES 1-10; and ROE )
CORPORATIONS 11-20, inclusive
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:14-cv-02030-APG-PAL
ORDER
14
15
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Wyndham Vacation Ownership’s Motion for
16
Exception to Attendance Requirements for Early Neutral Evaluation Session (#15), filed on
17
January 15, 2015.
18
The Defendant requests permission to excuse its insurance representative from the ENE
19
session due to the high deductible insurance policy covering this matter. Given this policy,
20
Defendant has shown good cause to excuse the insurance representative. Defendant also requests
21
that Peter Wendzel be excused from personal attendance at the ENE session for the sake of
22
economy and convenience. This is insufficient, especially in light of Mr. Wendzel’s “binding
23
authority to settle the matter.” Accordingly,
24
...
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
...
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Exception to Attendance
2
Requirements for Early Neutral Evaluation Session (#15) is granted in part and denied in part.
3
The Defendant’s insurance representative is excused from personal attendance. Peter Wendzel is
4
not excused from personal attendance.
5
DATED this 16th day of January, 2015.
6
7
8
9
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?