Wranik v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER that 15 Motion for Exception to Attendance Requirement for ENE Session is granted in part and denied in part. The Defendant's insurance representative is excused from personal attendance. Peter Wendzel is not excused from personal attendance. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 CHRISTOPHER WRANIK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WYNDHAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC.; ) EMPLOYEE(S)/AGENTS DOES 1-10; and ROE ) CORPORATIONS 11-20, inclusive ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:14-cv-02030-APG-PAL ORDER 14 15 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Wyndham Vacation Ownership’s Motion for 16 Exception to Attendance Requirements for Early Neutral Evaluation Session (#15), filed on 17 January 15, 2015. 18 The Defendant requests permission to excuse its insurance representative from the ENE 19 session due to the high deductible insurance policy covering this matter. Given this policy, 20 Defendant has shown good cause to excuse the insurance representative. Defendant also requests 21 that Peter Wendzel be excused from personal attendance at the ENE session for the sake of 22 economy and convenience. This is insufficient, especially in light of Mr. Wendzel’s “binding 23 authority to settle the matter.” Accordingly, 24 ... 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 ... 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Exception to Attendance 2 Requirements for Early Neutral Evaluation Session (#15) is granted in part and denied in part. 3 The Defendant’s insurance representative is excused from personal attendance. Peter Wendzel is 4 not excused from personal attendance. 5 DATED this 16th day of January, 2015. 6 7 8 9 GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?