Stolz v. Safeco Insurance Company Of America

Filing 36

ORDER that 35 Stipulation to Extend Time does not indicate that it impacts any Court- ordered deadlines. Accordingly, Court approval is not required and the stipulation is hereby STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/21/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

EDWARD STOLZ,

11

Plaintiff(s),

12

vs.

13

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF
AMERICA,

14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-02060-RFB-NJK
ORDER

(Docket No. 35)

16

Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s

17

discovery requests. Docket No. 35. Parties may stipulate to discovery extensions without Court

18

approval so long as the stipulation does not interfere with any deadlines set by the Court. See Fed. R.

19

Civ. P. 29. The pending stipulation does not indicate that it impacts any Court-ordered deadlines.

20

Accordingly, Court approval is not required and the stipulation is hereby STRICKEN from the docket.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

DATED: May 21, 2015

23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge