Scott v. Colvin
Filing
15
ORDER adopting ECF No. 14 Report and Recommendation; denying ECF No. 11 Motion to Remand to Agency; and granting ECF No. 12 Motion to Affirm. Clerk to enter judgment and close case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/25/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Rush H. Scott,
2:14-cv-02077-JAD-CWH
5
Plaintiff
6
v.
7
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social
Security Administration,
Order Adopting Report and
Recommendation, Denying Motion for
Reversal or Remand, and Granting CrossMotion to Affirm
8
Defendant
[ECF Nos. 11, 12, 14]
9
10
Rush Scott filed this action to seek review of the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of
11
his application for disability insurance benefits. Magistrate Judge Hoffman recommends that I deny
12
Scott’s motion for reversal or remand and grant the Commissioner’s cross-motion to affirm.1
13
Objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation were due May 20, 2016, and neither party has
14
filed an objection or requested an extension to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate
15
judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”2
16
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Magistrate
17
Judge Hoffman’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ADOPTED; Scott’s motion to
18
remand to social security [ECF No. 11] is DENIED; and the Commissioner’s motion to affirm
19
[ECF No. 12] is GRANTED.
20
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE.
21
Dated this 25th day of May, 2016.
22
_________________________________
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
2
ECF No. 14.
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?