Maxson v. Mosaic Sales Solutions Holding Company L.L.C.

Filing 30

ORDER that 28 Ex Parte Motion for a Stipulation to be Permitted to File Electronically and For a Waiver of PACER Fees is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/29/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 14 15 KIMBERLY A. MAXSON, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) MOSAIC SALES SOLUTIONS US ) OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, ) ) Defendant(s). ) __________________________________________) 16 Case No. 2:14-cv-02116-APG-NJK ORDER DENYING MOTION (Docket No. 28) Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion seeking various forms of relief, Docket No. 28, 17 which is hereby DENIED without prejudice. As an initial matter, Plaintiff filed the motion on an ex 18 parte basis. Ex parte motions are disfavored and only permitted in limited circumstances in which the 19 movant has shown “compelling reasons” for the ex parte nature of her filing. Local Rule 7-5(c). No 20 such showing has been made in this case and the Clerk’s Office is hereby INSTRUCTED to make 21 publicly available the motion at Docket No. 28. Moreover, the motion seeks various forms of relief, 22 including inter alia, reassignment of judges, a stipulation for service by email, a waiver of Pacer fees, 23 and an order permitting electronic filings. At this point in time, Defendant has not appeared in this case 24 and much of the relief sought appears to be premature. Moreover, parties are required to file a separate 25 motion for each type of relief sought. See Special Order No. 109. Lastly, while the Court is cognizant 26 that Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, she must nonetheless clearly identify the relief sought and clearly 27 explain the grounds for that relief. 28 // 1 For each of these reasons, the pending motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: April 29, 2015 4 5 ________________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?