Maxson v. Mosaic Sales Solutions Holding Company L.L.C.

Filing 7

ORDER that 6 Motion to Extend Time to File a Certificate of Interested Parties is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The deadline to file a certificate of interested parties is extended to January 21, 2015. The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to treat the instant motion as a notice that this case is related to Maxson v. Rodriguiez, 2:14-cv-1724-GMN-PAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/14/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

KIMBERLY A. MAXSON,

11

Plaintiff(s),

12

vs.

13

MOSAIC SALES SOLUTIONS HOLDING
COMPANY LLC,

14
Defendant(s).
15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-02116-APG-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 6)

On January 6, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a certificate of interested parties.

17

Docket No. 5. Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a 60-day extension to

18

comply with that order. Docket No. 6. The purpose of the certificate is to advise the Court of the

19

parties who may have an interest in the outcome of the case so that the assigned judges may evaluate

20

whether they have a conflict of interest which requires recusal. Filing the certificate is a simple

21

matter and should not require an extensive investigation. If Plaintiff knows of no other parties (other

22

than those named as parties in this case) who may have an interest in the outcome of this case, a

23

simple statement to that effect will suffice. The motion for an extension to file a certificate of

24

interested parties is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The deadline to file a certificate of

25

interested parties is extended to January 21, 2015.

26

The pending motion also seeks an extension of time to file a notice of related cases. Plaintiff

27

notes that another case that she filed in this Court was dismissed with prejudice. See, e.g., Docket

28

No. 6 at 2-3 (discussing Maxson v. Rodriguiez, 2:14-cv-1724-GMN-PAL). Plaintiff asserts that

1

there is a direct relationship between the cases. See id. at 5. As Plaintiff is pro se, the Court

2

construes her filings liberally and construes the pending motion as a notice of related cases.

3

Accordingly, the motion for an extension to file a notice of related cases is hereby DENIED as

4

moot. The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to treat the instant motion as a notice that this case is

5

related to Maxson v. Rodriguiez, 2:14-cv-1724-GMN-PAL.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

DATED: January 14, 2015

8
9

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2