Celis v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Filing
15
ORDER Granting 14 Stipulation of Dismissal against Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc. with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/5/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:14-cv-02124-JCM-VCF Document 14 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1
6
Danny J. Horen, Esq.
NV Bar No. 13153
Kazerouni Law Group, APC
7854 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Telephone: (800) 400-6808x7
Facsimile: (800) 520-5523
danny@kazlg.com
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
4
5
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
RICARDO CELIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
17
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No.: 2:14-cv-02124-JCM-VCF
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE,
INC.
Case 2:14-cv-02124-JCM-VCF Document 14 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff
RICARDO CELIS (“Plaintiff”), and CITIMORTGAGE, INC. (“Citi”), having
reached settlement, stipulate to dismiss Citi from the above-captioned matter, with
4
5
6
7
8
prejudice as to the Plaintiff’s claims against Citi. Each party will bear its own
costs, disbursements, and attorney fees.
Dated: September 28, 2015
9
10
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
/s/ Danny J. Horen ________
Danny Horen, Esq.
7854 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89117
800-400-6808
Email: danny@kazlg.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Andrew Bao______________
Andrew A. Bao, Esq.
2175 N. California Blvd. Suite 645
11
12
13
14
15
16
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
(925) 280-0004
Email: aabao@wolfewyman.com
Attorney for Citi
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED:
20
Citi is Dismissed from the instant matter, with Prejudice.
21
22
23
October 5, 2015
DATED: _____________
24
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?