Celis v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 15

ORDER Granting 14 Stipulation of Dismissal against Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc. with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/5/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-02124-JCM-VCF Document 14 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 2 1 6 Danny J. Horen, Esq. NV Bar No. 13153 Kazerouni Law Group, APC 7854 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89117 Telephone: (800) 400-6808x7 Facsimile: (800) 520-5523 danny@kazlg.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 5 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 RICARDO CELIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No.: 2:14-cv-02124-JCM-VCF STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE, INC. Case 2:14-cv-02124-JCM-VCF Document 14 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff RICARDO CELIS (“Plaintiff”), and CITIMORTGAGE, INC. (“Citi”), having reached settlement, stipulate to dismiss Citi from the above-captioned matter, with 4 5 6 7 8 prejudice as to the Plaintiff’s claims against Citi. Each party will bear its own costs, disbursements, and attorney fees. Dated: September 28, 2015 9 10 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP WOLFE & WYMAN LLP /s/ Danny J. Horen ________ Danny Horen, Esq. 7854 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89117 800-400-6808 Email: danny@kazlg.com Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Andrew Bao______________ Andrew A. Bao, Esq. 2175 N. California Blvd. Suite 645 11 12 13 14 15 16 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (925) 280-0004 Email: aabao@wolfewyman.com Attorney for Citi 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 Citi is Dismissed from the instant matter, with Prejudice. 21 22 23 October 5, 2015 DATED: _____________ 24 ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?