Okpoti v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 77

ORDER Granting 76 Stipulation to Redact Confidential Information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/16/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-00110-APG-CWH Document 76 Filed 06/09/16 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CITY OF LAS VEGAS BRADFORD R. JERBIC City Attorney Nevada Bar No. 01056 ELIAS P. GEORGE Deputy City Attorney Nevada Bar No. 12379 egeorge@lasvegasnevada.gov 495 S. Main Street, Sixth Floor Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 229-6629 (office) (702) 386-1749 (fax) Attorneys for City of Las Vegas 8 UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT 9 DI STRI CT OF NEVADA 10 11 NATHAN OKPOTI, an individual, CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00110-APG-CWH Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA; CITY OF LAS VEGAS, A PUBLIC ENTITY; OFFICER JOHN D. BRANDON, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, POLICE OFFICER DOES I-XX AND JOHN DOES IXX, INCLUSIVE, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 18 Defendants. 19 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) Rule 5.2, and 21 Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) Rule 501, the parties, by and through their respective 22 counsel, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court order the redaction of certain 23 confidential information provided during the deposition of the City of Las Vegas’ FRCP Rule 24 30(b)(6) witness, Lieutenant Martin Quintana, taken on April 27, 2016. Specifically, the parties 25 are requesting that only lines 16-20 on page 9 of Lt. Quintana’s deposition transcript be redacted 26 in order to keep confidential the peace officer’s home address. 27 28 Good cause exists for the Court to order the redaction of the requested information. Nevada Revised Statutes section 289.025 generally prohibits the disclosure of a peace officer’s City of Las Vegas 495 S. Main Street Sixth Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 229-6629 1 of 2 Case 2:15-cv-00110-APG-CWH Document 76 Filed 06/09/16 Page 2 of 2 1 home address for privacy reasons. When balanced with the presumption of public access to 2 judicial files, Kamakana v. City of Cnty. Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), the parties are 3 requesting only that limited portion of Lt. Quintana’s deposition transcript be redacted to 4 preserve his stated-protected privacy interests. See Henry A. Wilden, 271 F.R.D. 184, 189 (D. 5 Nev. 2010) (“A number of federal courts have recognized that [FRE] Rule 501 allows 6 recognition and respect for state evidentiary codes and privileges which express important state 7 interests and policies.”) (citations omitted). 8 Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that this Court order the redaction of Lt. 9 Quintana’s home address from his deposition testimony, specifically, lines 16-20 on page 9. 10 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: 11 Dated this 9th day of June, 2016. Dated this 9th day of June, 2016. 12 _/s/ Elias P. George___________ ELIAS P. GEORGE Deputy City Attorney CITY OF LAS VEGAS Nevada Bar No. 12379 495 South Main Street, Sixth Floor Las Vegas, NV 89101 egeorge@lasvegasnevada.gov Attorneys for Defendant City of Las Vegas _/s/ Robert Flummerfelt_________________ ROBERT FLUMMERFELT CANON LAW SERVICES, LLC Nevada Bar No. 11122 410 S. Rampart Blvd., Suite 390 Las Vegas, NV 89145 robert.flummerfelt@hotmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Nathan Okpoti 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Dated this 9th day of June, 2016. _/s/ Ryan Daniels__________________ RYAN DANIELS KAEMPFER CROWELL Nevada Bar No. 13094 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650 Las Vegas, NV 89135 rdaniels@kcnvlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Officer John Brandon 24 IT IS SO ORDERED: 25 27 ______________________________ The Honorable C.W. Hoffman Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 28 16 DATED: June ______, 2016. 26 City of Las Vegas 495 S. Main Street Sixth Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 229-6629 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?