Okpoti v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Filing
77
ORDER Granting 76 Stipulation to Redact Confidential Information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/16/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Case 2:15-cv-00110-APG-CWH Document 76 Filed 06/09/16 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CITY OF LAS VEGAS
BRADFORD R. JERBIC
City Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 01056
ELIAS P. GEORGE
Deputy City Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 12379
egeorge@lasvegasnevada.gov
495 S. Main Street, Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 229-6629 (office)
(702) 386-1749 (fax)
Attorneys for City of Las Vegas
8
UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT
9
DI STRI CT OF NEVADA
10
11
NATHAN OKPOTI, an individual,
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00110-APG-CWH
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
15
16
17
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, A POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF
NEVADA; CITY OF LAS VEGAS, A
PUBLIC ENTITY; OFFICER JOHN D.
BRANDON, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND
OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, POLICE
OFFICER DOES I-XX AND JOHN DOES IXX, INCLUSIVE,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
18
Defendants.
19
20
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) Rule 5.2, and
21
Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) Rule 501, the parties, by and through their respective
22
counsel, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court order the redaction of certain
23
confidential information provided during the deposition of the City of Las Vegas’ FRCP Rule
24
30(b)(6) witness, Lieutenant Martin Quintana, taken on April 27, 2016. Specifically, the parties
25
are requesting that only lines 16-20 on page 9 of Lt. Quintana’s deposition transcript be redacted
26
in order to keep confidential the peace officer’s home address.
27
28
Good cause exists for the Court to order the redaction of the requested information.
Nevada Revised Statutes section 289.025 generally prohibits the disclosure of a peace officer’s
City of Las Vegas
495 S. Main Street
Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 229-6629
1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-00110-APG-CWH Document 76 Filed 06/09/16 Page 2 of 2
1
home address for privacy reasons. When balanced with the presumption of public access to
2
judicial files, Kamakana v. City of Cnty. Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), the parties are
3
requesting only that limited portion of Lt. Quintana’s deposition transcript be redacted to
4
preserve his stated-protected privacy interests. See Henry A. Wilden, 271 F.R.D. 184, 189 (D.
5
Nev. 2010) (“A number of federal courts have recognized that [FRE] Rule 501 allows
6
recognition and respect for state evidentiary codes and privileges which express important state
7
interests and policies.”) (citations omitted).
8
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that this Court order the redaction of Lt.
9
Quintana’s home address from his deposition testimony, specifically, lines 16-20 on page 9.
10
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
11
Dated this 9th day of June, 2016.
Dated this 9th day of June, 2016.
12
_/s/ Elias P. George___________
ELIAS P. GEORGE
Deputy City Attorney
CITY OF LAS VEGAS
Nevada Bar No. 12379
495 South Main Street, Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
egeorge@lasvegasnevada.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
City of Las Vegas
_/s/ Robert Flummerfelt_________________
ROBERT FLUMMERFELT
CANON LAW SERVICES, LLC
Nevada Bar No. 11122
410 S. Rampart Blvd., Suite 390
Las Vegas, NV 89145
robert.flummerfelt@hotmail.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Nathan Okpoti
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Dated this 9th day of June, 2016.
_/s/ Ryan Daniels__________________
RYAN DANIELS
KAEMPFER CROWELL
Nevada Bar No. 13094
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650
Las Vegas, NV 89135
rdaniels@kcnvlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
and Officer John Brandon
24
IT IS SO ORDERED:
25
27
______________________________
The Honorable C.W. Hoffman Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
28
16
DATED: June ______, 2016.
26
City of Las Vegas
495 S. Main Street
Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 229-6629
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?