Augusta Investment Management, LLC v. Grunstad et al
Filing
12
ORDER Granting 8 Motion to Substitute Party. Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC substituted for Bank of America, N.A. (Successor by Merger). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for substitution of party Defendant pursuant
13
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c). Docket No. 8. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(c) provides that “[i]f an
14
interest is transferred, the action may be continued by or against the original party unless the court,
15
on motion, orders the transferee to be substituted in the action or joined with the original party.”
16
Courts have discretion to grant substitution where the transferee’s presence “would facilitate the
17
conduct of the litigation.” In re Bernal, 207 F.3d 595, 598 (9th Cir. 2000) (citing 7C Charles Alan
18
Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1958 (2d Ed.1986)).
19
Defendant requests the Court to substitute Carrington for Defendant Bank of America, N.A.
20
Docket No. 8. Defendant represents that, on January 21, 2015, Bank of America assigned the note
21
and Deed of Trust to the subject property to Carrington. Id., at 2, Exhibit C. Defendant further
22
represents that Bank of America no longer has any interest in the subject property. Id. On March
23
16, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion. Docket No. 11.
24
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for substitution of party (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED.
6
AUGUSTA INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT, LLC,
7
8
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
9
DOMONIC GRUNSTAD, et al.,
10
Defendant(s).
25
ORDER
(Docket No. 8)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Case No. 2:15-cv-00125-GMN-NJK
DATED: March 17, 2015
27
28
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?