CitiMortgage, Inc. v. MDGGG Trust

Filing 51

ORDER Denying as moot Defendant MDGGG Trust's 17 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 03/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,

8
9
10

Case No. 2:15-CV-154 JCM (VCF)
Plaintiff(s),

ORDER

v.
MDGGG TRUST,

11

Defendant(s).

12
13

Presently before the court is defendant MDGGG Trust’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

14

(Doc. # 17). Plaintiff CitiMortgage, Inc. filed a response, (doc. # 21) and defendant MDGGG filed

15
16

a reply. (Doc. # 23).
This motion requests the dismissal of plaintiff’s original complaint. (Doc. # 1). However,
plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (Doc. # 25).

17
18

An amended complaint supersedes the original pleading, making it "non-existent."
Valadez-Lopez v. Chertoff, 656 F.3d 851,857 (9th Cir. 2011). If a litigant files an amended

19

pleading, then motions to dismiss the original complaint are mooted without prejudice. Johnson v.

20

Cheryl, 2013 WL 3943606, at *2 (D. Nev. 2013).

21

Accordingly,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant MDGGG

23

Trust’s motion to dismiss the original complaint (doc. # 17) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED

24

as moot without prejudice.

25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

DATED March 17, 2016.
__________________________________________
___ _________________________
__
___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NITED
D
JUDG