My Global Village LLC v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
Filing
69
ORDER that the claims by My Global Village, LLC against Nevada Association Services, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2). Clerk directed to close case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 01/06/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
______________________________________
)
)
MY GLOBAL VILLAGE, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
)
ASSOCIATION et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
2:15-cv-00211-RCJ-NJK
ORDER
12
13
This case arises out of a homeowner’s association foreclosure sale. In 2003, non-party
14
Carl D. Carlos purchased real property at 7709 Wedlock Lane, Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 (“the
15
Property”), giving non-party SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. a promissory note in the amount of
16
$181,600 (“the Note”), secured by a deed of trust (“the DOT”) against the Property. (See Answer
17
& Countercl. ¶ 10, ECF No. 5). Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie
18
Mae”) purchased the Note on March 1, 2003 and obtained a separate assignment of the DOT on
19
October 13, 2013, (id. ¶¶ 12, 14), although the DOT had followed the Note to Fannie Mae on
20
March 1, 2003 as a matter of law, see, e.g., Edelstein v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 286 P.3d 249, 257
21
(Nev. 2012). The Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) placed Fannie Mae into
22
conservatorship on September 6, 2008. (Answer & Countercl. ¶ 13). On December 5, 2014,
23
Counterdefendant Mountain Shadow Homeowner’s Association, Inc. (“the HOA”) sold the
24
1 of 3
1
Property to Plaintiff My Global Village, LLC (“MGV”) at an HOA sale for $138,000, although
2
the fair market value of the Property was over $250,000. (Id. ¶¶ 30, 33, 36).
MGV sued Fannie Mae and trustee/auctioneer Nevada Association Services, Inc.
3
4
(“NAS”) in state court to quiet title to the Property, for a declaration that the HOA sale
5
extinguished the DOT, for an injunction against Fannie Mae foreclosing under the DOT, and for
6
breach of contract and indemnification against NAS. Fannie Mae removed, answered, and filed
7
a Counterclaim against MGV and the HOA for declaratory relief that the HOA foreclosure
8
cannot have extinguished Fannie Mae’s interest in the DOT under 12 U.S.C. § 4617(j)(3), to
9
quiet title to the Property, and, in the alternative, for unjust enrichment. NAS separately
10
answered. The FHFA intervened as a Defendant, answered, and filed a Counterclaim against
11
MGV, the HOA, and NAS for declaratory relief that the HOA foreclosure cannot have
12
extinguished its interest in the DOT and to quiet title to the Property under 12 U.S.C.
13
§ 4617(j)(3). The HOA asked the Court to dismiss Fannie Mae’s counterclaims for lack of
14
subject matter jurisdiction, and the Court denied the motion. The HOA later asked the Court to
15
dismiss FHFA’s counterclaim for failure to state a claim, and the FHFA and Fannie Mae asked
16
the Court to grant them offensive summary judgment on their counterclaims. The Court granted
17
the HOA’s motion and dismissed it from the case because it disclaimed any interest in the
18
Property. The Court also granted the FHFA’s and Fannie Mae’s motion and ordered them to
19
submit a proposed form of judgment. They complied, and the Court entered the judgment. Only
20
MGV’s claims against NAS remained at that point. The parties have informed the Court that the
21
remaining claims have been resolved.
22
///
23
///
24
2 of 3
CONCLUSION
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims by My Global Village, LLC against Nevada
3
Association Services, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2).
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall close the case.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated this 6th day of January, 2017.
7
8
9
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?